Do hard traffic measures produce hard changes? A case study of individuals’ changing mobility behaviour and environmental concern following the implementation of a modal filter in Aachen, Germany
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22432010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jennifer Bosen (0000-0002-6964-9604, Gender Studies), Calvin Röhl (Gender Studies, corresponding author), Carmen Leicht-Scholten (0000-0003-2451-6629, Gender Studies) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban, Planning and Transport Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2165-0020 • E-ISSN: 2165-0020 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21650020.2026.2650221 |
| OpenAlex | W7144363868 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
In the transition to sustainable mobility, many cities aim to reduce motorised transport and promote active modes of travel. In June 2021, the city of Aachen, Germany, together with citizen and student associations closed a section of the inner-city ring street ‘Templergraben’ to individual motorised transport (IMT) by implementing a modal filter for IMT through traffic as a ‘hard measure’. The street section and its surrounding infrastructure were transformed into a living lab. This paper aims to assess the impact of the hard measure on individuals’ mobility behaviour as pro-environmental behaviour (PEB) in relation to their environmental concern (EC). We conducted a survey (N = 1243) in autumn 2021 to measure the respondents’ acceptance of the modal filter, their EC, and their mobility behaviour. We operationalise cost through transport equity and perform various linear regression models to enable empirical validation of the low-cost hypothesis within high-cost subgroups. Our findings demonstrate how inequitable burdens disrupt the connection between environmental concern, acceptance of a modal filter, and PEB in high-cost mobility situations. We conclude that hard measures alone fail to induce PEB in high-cost contexts, but equity-centred soft measures could facilitate the translation of EC into PEB via increased acceptance.
Modal · Older Adults Driving Studies · Traffic and Road Safety · Urban Transport and Accessibility
‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory
Information bias in health research
Good Intents, but Low Impacts
Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies
The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior
Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures
Relationships Among Environmental Attitudes, Environmental Efficacy, and Pro-Environmental Behaviors Across and Within 11 Countries
Climate change and air pollution
Exploring the Differential Effect of Life Satisfaction on Low and High-Cost Pro-Environmental Behaviors
Assessing the Polarising Impacts of Low-Traffic Neighbourhoods
Travelling together alone and alone together
All talk and no action? An analysis of environmental concern, income and greenhouse gas emissions in Switzerland
Mind the Gap
Equity in new active travel infrastructure
Moving towards sustainability? Mobility styles, attitudes and individual travel behaviour
Zahlungsbereitschaft für kollektive Umweltgüter / Willingness to Pay for Collective Environmental Goods
Die Low-Cost-Hypothese
Die Umstellung auf ökologische Landwirtschaft
Travel Demand Management Targeting Reduced Private Car Use
New Environmental Theories
Vélomobility is to degrowth as automobility is to growth
Green and Greenback
Environmental Behavior
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |