Analyzing Dialogicity in Online and Face-to-Face Settings
The Influence of Teaching Modality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22433747 |
|---|---|
| Authors | José Luna (0000-0002-4539-6163, Universitat de Barcelona), Mercè Garcia-Milà (0000-0001-7628-7552, Universitat de Barcelona), Andrea Miralda-Banda (0000-0002-2733-118X, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | A129-A151 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2325-3290 • E-ISSN: 2325-3290 |
| Publisher | University Library System, University of Pittsburgh (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5195/dpj.2026.746 |
| OpenAlex | W7167013279 |
| Language | EN |
This study examines the development of dialogicity in two distinct learning modalities—face-to-face and online—during a 10-session cultural literacy intervention involving 10th-grade high school students. Dialogicity refers to the quality of dialogue in terms of the degree to which student interactions promote sustained discussion and the co-construction of meanings. We analyzed and compared four sessions in each learning modality. The results indicated no significant differences in the overall frequency of dialogic moves between the two modalities. However, there were differences in the degree of dialogicity. High-dialogicity moves were significantly more frequent in the face-to-face classroom. Furthermore, metadialogue, a critical component for guiding and reflecting on discussions, was used more frequently in the face-to-face modality. Students employed it to guide discussions toward achieving the session objectives. In the online classroom, students encountered technical difficulties that disrupted the flow of dialogue, which made metadialogue even more important to overcome these problems. The findings suggest that future dialogic teaching interventions for online classrooms should be designed specifically for this modality. The design should include a scaffolding process for dialogicity — whereby students were progressively introduced to dialogic skills across sessions — to help students navigate these challenges and foster higher-quality discussions.
Dialogic · Psychological intervention · Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
| Highly cited | No |
|---|