Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing terrestrial vertebrates as potential biodiversity indicators of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes

Bibliographic Data

ID22435387
AuthorsFelipe S Campos (0000-0001-7415-0202, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, corresponding author), João David (0000-0002-0192-098X, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, corresponding author), Ricardo Lourenço‐de‐Moraes (0000-0001-6055-5380, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte), Lisieux Fuzessy (0000-0001-9599-9782, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales), Neftalí Sillero (0000-0002-3490-3780, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia), Pedro Cabral (0000-0001-8622-6008, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, corresponding author), Javier Retana (0000-0002-7505-9467, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona)
Year2026
Publication date2026-07-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePeople and Nature (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2575-8314 • E-ISSN: 2575-8314
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/pan3.70401
OpenAlexW7169667076
LanguageEN
References cited123

Combining ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation is critical for evaluating the benefits of nature to society. However, research gaps have led to a conservation dilemma in determining which biodiversity groups should be selected in ecosystem service assessments. To contribute to the ongoing debate on the role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services, we assess the performance of terrestrial vertebrates as biodiversity indicators of ecosystem services based on their spatial alignment across landscapes. Using mainland Portugal as a case study, we model the spatial supply of eight ecosystem services with the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade‐offs (InVEST) toolkit and related land cover‐based spatial models. Using a transferable spatial framework, we apply the indicator value index to map how biodiversity and ecosystem service targets co‐occur in multifunctional landscapes where natural and semi‐natural ecosystems coexist with long‐term human land uses. Based on species distribution data for amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, we identify reptiles as the vertebrate group most strongly associated with ecosystem services. Our results show that reptiles are spatially associated with all eight ecosystem services assessed and account for around 40% of the total indicator value scores. In contrast, the other vertebrate groups are each associated with four services, and habitat quality is the only ecosystem service common to all groups. These findings suggest that terrestrial vertebrates, especially reptiles, may serve as potential biodiversity indicators of multiple ecosystem service supply patterns. Under the Post‐2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, our findings introduce a GIS‐based approach for a better understanding of relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem services, including their representativeness in protected areas, according to the European Natura 2000 network. The study also contributes to an ongoing national effort to map the supply of multiple ecosystem services based on sets of possible indicator values derived from the landscape. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Biodiversity · Ecosystem · Ecosystem health · Ecosystem Management · Ecosystem services · Habitat · Measurement of biodiversity · Terrestrial ecosystem · Total human ecosystem · Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation

  • Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes

    Open Access•Lenore Fahrig, Jacques Baudry et al.•Ecology Letters•2011

  • Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services

    Open Access•Edward M Bennett, Glen D Peterson et al.•Ecology Letters•2009

  • Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies

    Open Access•Anna F Cord, B Bartkowski et al.•Ecosystem Services•2017

  • Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow

    Open Access•Amy M Villamagna, Paul L Angermeier et al.•Ecological Complexity•2013

  • Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century

    Open Access•Sean Maxwell, Sean L Maxwell et al.•Nature•2020

  • Mapping cultural ecosystem services

    Open Access•Maria Luisa Paracchini, Grazia Zulian et al.•Ecological Indicators•2014

  • Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services

    Open Access•P A Harrison, P M Berry et al.•Ecosystem Services•2014

  • Grasslands—more important for ecosystem services than you might think

    Open Access•Jan Bengtsson, James M Bullock et al.•Ecosphere•2019

  • Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change

    Open Access•Sandra Dı́az, Josef Settele et al.•Science•2019

  • WorldClim 2

    Open Access•Stephen E Fick, Robert J Hijmans•International Journal of…•2017

  • Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people

    Open Access•Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer, Richard Sharp et al.•Science•2019

  • Welcome to the Tidyverse

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham, Mara Averick et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2019

  • Modelling Sediment Retention Services and Soil Erosion Changes in Portugal

    Open Access•Susana M Marques, Felipe S Campos et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2021

  • Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability

    Open Access•Kai M A Chan, David R Boyd et al.•People and Nature•2020

  • Intention of preserving forest remnants among landowners in the Atlantic Forest

    Open Access•Karina Campos Tisovec‐Dufner, Lucas Teixeira et al.•People and Nature•2019

  • The challenge of feeding the world while conserving half the planet

    Open Access•Zia Mehrabi, Erle C Ellis et al.•Nature Sustainability•2018

  • Mapping trade-offs and synergies among peri-urban ecosystem services to address spatial policy

    Open Access•Marta Sylla, Nina Hagemann et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2020

  • Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning

    Open Access•Erik Gomez‐baggethun, Erik Gómez-Baggethun et al.•Ecological Economics•2012

  • Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services

    Open Access•Christopher M Raymond, Brett A Bryan et al.•Ecological Economics•2009

  • European Soil Data Centre

    Open Access•Panos Panagos, Marc Van Liedekerke et al.•Land Use Policy•2012

  • Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale

    Open Access•Panos Panagos, Pasquale Borrelli et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • European National Parks protect their surroundings but not everywhere

    Open Access•M Mingarro, Jennifer Mason Lobo et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Trends and gaps in biodiversity and ecosystem services research

    Open Access•Viktoria Takacs, Denise O''Brien et al.•AMBIO•2023

  • Urban ecology and sustainability

    Open Access•Jianguo Wu•Landscape and Urban Planning•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae