The weight of lecturers’ pedagogical practices in developing higher and lower-order thinking skills in higher education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22436834 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francis Tabiri (0000-0002-1089-7638, University of Cape Coast, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-11 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discover Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2731-5525 • E-ISSN: 2731-5525 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s44217-026-01118-4 |
| OpenAlex | W7128598046 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
It appears that higher education students, particularly those in Sub-Saharan Africa, struggle to demonstrate critical thinking skills, leading to their adoption of a rote learning approach. This results in the practice of “chew, pour, pass, forget” (CPPF), ultimately hindering their ability to create opportunities for themselves after graduation. This problem seems to be partly associated with pedagogical practices in higher education, and so several studies have been conducted to investigate lecturers’ pedagogical practices in higher education. However, it appears that most of these studies have focused solely on exploring the nature of lecturers’ practices. Hence, the present study departs from previous studies by quantifying lecturers’ practices to determine their level of concentration on lower-order and higher-order thinking skills. The study focuses on three disciplinary fields, namely English, Religion, and History, by utilising the case study design. While two iterated observations are conducted for each discipline in a semester, 120 documents are selected, including 60 course outlines (20 from each discipline) and 60 examination past questions (20 from each discipline). Frequencies and percentages, as well as the loglikelihood calculator, are considered for the study. Findings from the study show that collectively, lecturers have developed an epistemic predisposition to adopt practices that focus more on higher-order thinking skills such as creativity, criticality, collaboration, and communication. However, the tendency to focus more on higher-order thinking skills does not materialise in their instructional discourse and assessment practices, especially among History lecturers. The findings imply that lecturers are unable to translate their expectations into pedagogical practices in the development of higher-order thinking skills in students, thereby curtailing their employability after school. It is, thus, recommended that lecturers (especially History lecturers) should adopt pragmatic and innovative measures in utilizing practices that foster higher-order thinking skills in their discourse-related and assessment practices for the realisation of transformative education.
Critical thinking · Discipline · Focus group · Higher education · Rote learning · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Case Study Research in Practice
Student Writing as 'Academic Literacies'
The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language
Academic literacies and the tilts within
Teaching Academic Literacies in international relations
Teaching for the 21st century
Understanding Technology Literacy
Constructing Images of Ourselves? A Critical Investigation into ‘Approaches to Learning’ Research in Higher Education
Student writing in higher education
The "Academic Literacies" Model
| Highly cited | No |
|---|