Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nutrition, bone mass, and subsequent risk of hip fracture in white women

Bibliographic Data

ID22474965
AuthorsZhiping Huang (0009-0006-6196-0277, University of Minnesota, corresponding author), John H Himes (University of Minnesota)
Year1998
Volume10
Issue5
Pages661-667
Publication date1998-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Human Biology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1042-0533 • E-ISSN: 1520-6300
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1998)10:5<661::aid-ajhb12>3.3.co;2-w
OpenAlexW4237850677
LanguageEN

The interrelationships between nutritional status, concurrent bone density, bone dimensions, and risk of subsequent hip fracture were investigated using data from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and its three follow-up studies. A cohort of 890 White women aged 45 years or older who received nutritional and bone measurements in the baseline survey in 1971–75 were recontacted in 1982–84, 1986, and 1987. Height, weight, serum albumin, total energy intake, bone density, and bone dimensions were measured at baseline. Thirty-three incident hip fractures were identified during 12,190 person-years of follow-up. Total energy intake and serum albumin were little correlated with concurrent bone density and bone dimensions. Serum albumin, total energy intake, and weight tended to be inversely associated with risk of hip fracture. The multivariable relative risks were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57–0.98) for one standard deviation increment of serum albumin, 0.67 (95% CI = 0.42–1.07) for dietary energy intake, and 0.61 (95% CI = 0.38–0.97) for weight, respectively. Height was positively, but not significantly associated with risk of hip fracture. Nutritional effects on hip fracture were independent of concurrent bone density and bone dimensions. Higher bone density was protective of subsequent hip fracture (relative risk = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.36–0.83, for one standard deviation increment of bone density) independent of effects related to concurrent nutritional status. Thus, poor nutritional status and reduced bone density appeared to increase the risks of subsequent hip fracture independently. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 10:661–667, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Bone density · Bone mineral · Confidence interval · Hip bone · Hip fracture · Osteoporosis · Relative risk · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Dentistry · Hip and Femur Fractures · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nutrition and Health in Aging

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae