What is "heard" at a pipeline hearing
The gerrymandering of aurality in British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2260182 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lee Veeraraghavan (Department of Music Tulane University New Orleans USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 126 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 248-259 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Anthropologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7294 • E-ISSN: 1548-1433 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/aman.13965 |
| OpenAlex | W4392350949 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 36 |
This article explores how sound technologies are deployed by government agencies to produce legitimacy in the struggle over oil pipelines in British Columbia, Canada. Activists seeking to stop the Northern Gateway and Trans Mountain pipelines have mobilized noise and silence as tactics of protest and refusal. For example, one thousand demonstrators make a cacophony outside a Vancouver hotel in protest of the Northern Gateway pipeline. Communications technology, though, is deployed here by the state to compress and control. In one of the hotel's small, impregnable conference rooms, public hearings over the pipeline are taking place-only the public is not allowed inside: the proceedings are being livestreamed to a hotel two kilometers away. On unceded Coast Salish territory, the legitimacy of pipeline hearings is also contested because the continued existence of Indigenous legal orders represents a challenge to the pipelines in question. Technological mediation makes it possible to satisfy one requirement of legitimacy: democratically granted representative power. The challenge to the legal system highlighted by the continued existence of the Indigenous, though, is managed through audile techniques deployed as anthropotechnologies. The implications for a politics of sound must be considered in light of sound's mediation, which is never politically neutral
Criminology · Democracy · Gerrymandering · Media studies · Pipeline (software · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Diverse Musicological Studies · Engineering · History · Law
Noise
“Métis”
Of Grammatology
Japanoise
Blocking pipelines, unsettling environmental justice
Oral History on Trial
The Governance of the Prior
Aurality
Theses on the New Öffentlichkeit
Delgamuukw
Tribunal administration and the duty to consult
Hungry listening resonant theory for indigenous sound studies
Understanding media
Acoustic Multinaturalism, the Value of Nature, and the Nature of Music in Ecomusicology
The Theology of Sound
The Cunning of Recognition
The aurality of pipeline politics and listening for nacreous clouds
Cooperation without Submission
Doing anthropology in sound
Cartographies of Consignment
Pipelines, permits, and protests
The Reorganization of the Sensory World
Rethinking Indigeneity
Soundscapes
Jurisdictions of significance
What is "heard" at a pipeline hearing
The varieties of sonic experience
Capitalist Transformation and Settler Colonialism
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |