Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What is "heard" at a pipeline hearing

The gerrymandering of aurality in British Columbia, Canada

Bibliographic Data

ID2260182
AuthorsLee Veeraraghavan (Department of Music Tulane University New Orleans USA, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume126
Issue2
Pages248-259
Publication date2024-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Anthropologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7294 • E-ISSN: 1548-1433
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/aman.13965
OpenAlexW4392350949
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited36

This article explores how sound technologies are deployed by government agencies to produce legitimacy in the struggle over oil pipelines in British Columbia, Canada. Activists seeking to stop the Northern Gateway and Trans Mountain pipelines have mobilized noise and silence as tactics of protest and refusal. For example, one thousand demonstrators make a cacophony outside a Vancouver hotel in protest of the Northern Gateway pipeline. Communications technology, though, is deployed here by the state to compress and control. In one of the hotel's small, impregnable conference rooms, public hearings over the pipeline are taking place-only the public is not allowed inside: the proceedings are being livestreamed to a hotel two kilometers away. On unceded Coast Salish territory, the legitimacy of pipeline hearings is also contested because the continued existence of Indigenous legal orders represents a challenge to the pipelines in question. Technological mediation makes it possible to satisfy one requirement of legitimacy: democratically granted representative power. The challenge to the legal system highlighted by the continued existence of the Indigenous, though, is managed through audile techniques deployed as anthropotechnologies. The implications for a politics of sound must be considered in light of sound's mediation, which is never politically neutral

Criminology · Democracy · Gerrymandering · Media studies · Pipeline (software · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Diverse Musicological Studies · Engineering · History · Law

  • Acoustic Coercion

    Open Access•Argyrios Kokoris•Nationalities Papers•2026

  • Music, Sound, Politics

    Open Access•Matt Sakakeeny•Annual Review of Anthropology•2024

  • What is "heard" at a pipeline hearing

    Open Access•Lee Veeraraghavan•American Anthropologist•2024

  • Noise

    Jacques Attali•Noise•1989

  • “Métis”

    Chris Andersen•"Métis"•2014

  • Of Grammatology

    Jacques Derrida•Of Grammatology•2016

  • Japanoise

    Open Access•David Novák•Japanoise•2013

  • Blocking pipelines, unsettling environmental justice

    Leah Temper•Local Environment•2019

  • Oral History on Trial

    B G Miller•Oral History on Trial•2011

  • The Governance of the Prior

    E A Povinelli•Interventions•2011

  • Aurality

    Ana María Ochoa Gautier•Aurality•2014

  • Theses on the New Öffentlichkeit

    Rosalind C Morris•Grey Room•2013

  • Delgamuukw

    Open Access•Val Napoleon•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2005

  • Tribunal administration and the duty to consult

    Sari Graben, Abbey Sinclair•University of Toronto Law Journal•2015

  • Hungry listening resonant theory for indigenous sound studies

    Dylan Robinson•Hungry Listening•2020

  • Understanding media

    Marshall Mcluhan, Marshal McLuhan•Understanding media•1994

  • Acoustic Multinaturalism, the Value of Nature, and the Nature of Music in Ecomusicology

    Ana María Ochoa Gautier•boundary 2•2016

  • The Theology of Sound

    Jonathan Sterne•Canadian Journal of Communication•2011

  • The Cunning of Recognition

    Elizabeth A Povinelli, George Steinmetz et al.•Cunning of Recognition•2002

  • The aurality of pipeline politics and listening for nacreous clouds

    Open Access•Kate Galloway•Popular Music•2020

  • Cooperation without Submission

    Justin B Richland•Cooperation Without Submission•2021

  • Doing anthropology in sound

    Open Access•Steven Feld, Donald Brenneis•American Ethnologist•2004

  • Cartographies of Consignment

    Tom Özden‐schilling, Tom Özden-Schilling•Anthropological Quarterly•2019

  • Pipelines, permits, and protests

    Open Access•Tyler A Mccreary, Tyler Mccreary et al.•Cultural Geographies•2014

  • The Reorganization of the Sensory World

    Thomas Porcello, Louise Meintjes et al.•Annual Review of Anthropology•2010

  • Rethinking Indigeneity

    Jessica R Cattelino, Jessica Cattelino et al.•Annual Review of Anthropology•2022

  • Soundscapes

    David W Samuels, Louise Meintjes et al.•Annual Review of Anthropology•2010

  • Jurisdictions of significance

    Open Access•Justin B Richland•American Ethnologist•2018

  • What is "heard" at a pipeline hearing

    Open Access•Lee Veeraraghavan•American Anthropologist•2024

  • The varieties of sonic experience

    Open Access•Mariam Goshadze•American Anthropologist•2022

  • Capitalist Transformation and Settler Colonialism

    Open Access•I Ramones, Sally Engle Merry•American Anthropologist•2021

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae