Tracing Associations in Global Finance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2264321 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tony Porter (0000-0001-9798-1885, McMaster University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 334-338 |
| Publication date | 2013-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Political Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1749-5679 • E-ISSN: 1749-5687 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ips.12026_2 |
| OpenAlex | W1998555111 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 14 |
Four decades ago, when financial globalization was attracting widespread attention, the few theoretical frameworks that were available to analyze it were relatively simplistic. Often, it was seen as an unstoppable quasi-natural expression of the expansion of market forces, operating independently of state power, which it was undermining. Today there is a rich variety of frameworks which help us understand the immensely complex entanglements of power, states, markets, and international institutions that constitute and govern global finance, including some insightful uses of actor-network theory (ANT) (for instance, Langley ; Best forthcoming ). In this contribution I highlight a number of unique contributions that ANT makes to our understanding of global finance. Actor-network theory focuses on the importance of micro-level connections among humans and “non-humans” such as other life-forms, technical artifacts, or physical objects. Latour (:5) has advocated studying these types of associations rather than the social: to redefine sociology “not as the ‘science of the social’, but as the tracing of associations.” He argues that the social is too often used as a shorthand that obscures the painstaking and often fragile ways that collectivities are constructed and assembled. The social then can become “invisible, untraceable, ubiquitous, and total ... It's only if forces are made of smaller ties, whose resistance can be tested one by one, that you might have a chance to modify a given state of affairs. To put it bluntly: if there is a society, then no politics is possible” (Latour :250). ANT's insistence on tracing out associations is a valuable corrective to the common tendency to see global finance as involving large, powerful, unstoppable forces operating independently of humans. On closer examination, it becomes apparent that global finance is heavily dependent on careful, detailed coordination of particular humans and objects, and this coordination often fails (McKeen-Edwards and Porter )
Actor–network theory · Economics · Epistemology · Globalization · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Tracing · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Computer Science · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Artificial Intelligence
Big Tech as World Makers
Understanding technological change in global finance through infrastructures
The Politics of Climate Change Knowledge
Situating global finance in the Land Rush Debate
The chain of security
Theorising international monetary relations
Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism
Science in action
Governing Failure - Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance
Science in Democracy
Securitising Suburbia
An Engine, Not a Camera
Reassembling the Social
Is Actor Network Theory Critique
Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation
The Anti-Network
Politics of Nature
Callonistics
| Citations per year | 0.58 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |