The many meanings of care in clinical research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2265786 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michele M Easter (0000-0003-4294-4133, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Gail E Henderson (0000-0002-4968-7064, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Arlene M Davis (0000-0001-6486-0446, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Larry R Churchill (Ethics and Public Policy Center), Nancy M P King (0000-0001-9460-7484, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 695-712 |
| Publication date | 2006-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00537.x |
| PMID | 17184413 |
| OpenAlex | W1486943396 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 33 |
| References cited | 39 |
The conduct of clinical research often involves two distinguishable sets of relationships: the researcher-subject relationship, and the clinician-patient relationship. Some scholars argue that being a patient in a clinical care setting and a subject in a research study are so different that anything that would promote in subjects the view that they are in clinician-patient relationships is exploitative and deceptive. This paper presents findings intended to initiate a more empirically-based discussion of this issue. Using data from 82 in-depth interviews with physician-investigators, nurse-study coordinators and patient-subjects in early phase clinical trials, we find that research personnel are likely to be seen, and to see themselves, as clinical caregivers. We also find evidence that while researchers and subjects often tend to view care and research as conflicting activities, both parties tend to see research as a way of caring for patients. We found no relationship, however, between subjects' perception of care-giving by researchers and the tendency to misunderstand that they are in a research study. Because research, by necessity and inclination, is unlikely ever to be 'care-free', we recommend that the ethical debate surrounding the danger of confusing research with treatment take into account the kinds of care described by respondents
Clinical research · Clinical trial · Perception · Subject (documents · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Social Psychology
Between Neutrality and Engagement
Developing Clinical Research Relationship
Navigating the dual role of physician and clinician investigator in end-of-life research
The unheard path
Beyond the ‘therapeutic misconception’
Balancing methodological purity and social relevance
(Re)configuring research value
Choisir le risque
French Public Familiarity and Attitudes toward Clinical Research during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Extending experimentation
Une « illusion thérapeutique » ? Reconfigurations locales de la recherche clinique sur le VIH au Sénégal
Therapeutic Misperceptions in Early‐Phase Cancer Trials
Motivations for the ‘gift-of-care’ in the context of the modernisation of medicine
The bioethical misconception
In the mood for science
Les paradoxes du care dans les essais cliniques de phase I en oncologie
Paradoxes of care in phase I cancer clinical trials
Ethics in action
Blinding Authority
The Co-production of Science, Ethics, and Emotion
Clinical trials as treatment option
Wicked' ethics
Participating in Research
Understanding the outcomes of multi-centre clinical trials
Flexible positions, managed hopes
Distinguishing research from clinical care in cancer genetics
Hegemony in the marketplace of biomedical innovation
International clinical trials, cardiovascular disease and treatment options in the Russian Federation
They should take time
Utiliser la recherche pour soigner le cancer
Careful science? Bodywork and care practices in randomised clinical trials
Mutual Benefit, Added Value
Clean Blood, Religion, and Moral Triage in Tuberculosis Vaccine Trials
The Managed Heart
The therapeutic misconception
Critical Bioethics
Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials
Qualitative Data Analysis in Health Psychology
The Ancillary-Care Responsibilities of Medical Researchers
Trust
Phase I Cancer Trials
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
The Managed Heart
Quantitative Analysis of Ethical Issues in Phase I Trials
Science versus care
Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation
In a Different Voice
Ordered to Care
The Sociology of Medical Science and Technology
Understanding The Decision to Participate in a Survey
The Role-Set
Experiment Perilous
Integrating conflicting professional roles
Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials
From Faust to Strangelove
Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation
Recent Developments in Role Theory
Care = organisation + physical labour + emotional labour
Sentimental work in the technologized hospital
| Unique citing works | 33 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,83 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2026 (19) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 32 |