Response
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22735546 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marcello Carmagnani (University of Turin, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 181-183 |
| Publication date | 1985-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Latin American Research Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0023-8791 • E-ISSN: 1542-4278 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0023879100034336 |
| OpenAlex | W4312970932 |
| Language | EN |
The way in which individual historians conceive of their craft is clearly shown when they evaluate historiographic results. If, as in my case, one thinks that history should lead to a critical reflection of the society studied, the result will be a historiographic review that presents problems, debates them, and adopts a certain position. Obviously, this way of approaching a historiographic review (which will not necessarily please everyone) has the merit of opening debate, as is shown by the stimulating comments of Professors Martin, MacLeod, and Kicza, a debate that this reply in no way attempts to close.
Business · Materials Science · Psychiatric care and mental health services
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |