Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

(Mis)information, Polarization, and Trust in Elections

Longitudinal Evidence from Canada

Bibliographic Data

ID22763590
AuthorsMathieu Lavigne (0000-0003-3408-9923, McGill University), Holly Ann Garnett (0000-0002-2119-4399, Royal Military College of Canada), Aengus Bridgman (0000-0003-1130-1258, McGill University)
Year2026
Publication date2026-06-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfag035
OpenAlexW7165395039
LanguageEN
References cited83

Scholars have suggested that we are experiencing a global crisis in trust in elections, with political polarization and misinformation often cited as reasons for distrust. However, empirical evaluations of perceptions of election integrity over time remain scarce. Using data from the Canadian Election Study from 2008 to 2021 and the Media Ecosystem Observatory from 2021, we show that trust in electoral management bodies, measured in terms of confidence, satisfaction, and fairness, has significantly declined since 2019 among Canadians with a right-wing ideology or who support right-wing parties. We find evidence that rising affective polarization, right-wing and social media consumption, and belief in US-based election fraud narratives are associated with significant trust declines in electoral integrity. The results identify key factors linked to the recent politicization of citizens’ perceptions of election fairness and have important implications for the health of our democracy.

Empirical evidence · General election · Ideology · Misinformation · Perception · Polarization (electrochemistry) · Politics · Social media · Survey data collection · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Media and Politics

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Follow the Leader?

    Gabriel S Lenz•Follow the leader?•2012

  • American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•Noam Gidron, James Adams et al.•American Affective Polarization…•2020

  • Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms

    Open Access•Katherine Clayton, Nicholas T Davis et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2021

  • Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jaime E Settle et al.•Nature•2023

  • The Partisan Brain

    Open Access•Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Andrea Pereira•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2018

  • Tweeting From Left to Right

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá et al.•Psychological Science•2015

  • Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook

    Open Access•Eytan Bakshy, Messing et al.•Science•2015

  • Democracy and the Market

    Open Access•Adam Przeworski•Democracy and the Market•1991

  • Polarization, Eh?

    Open Access•Eric Merkley•Polarization, Eh?•2026

  • Populist attitudes and politicians’ disinformation accusations

    Open Access•Jana Laura Egelhofer, Ming M Boyer et al.•Journal of Communication•2022

  • Electoral integrity matters

    Open Access•Marlene Mauk•Quality & Quantity•2022

  • Red Media, Blue Media

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Kyu S Hahn•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States

    Open Access•Manjana Milkoreit, E Keith Smith•Public Understanding of Science•2025

  • In Praise of Skepticism

    P Norris•In Praise of Skepticism•2022

  • Why Electoral Integrity Matters

    Open Access•P Norris•Why Electoral Integrity Matters•2014

  • Losers' Consent

    Christopher Anderson, Christopher J Anderson et al.•Losers' consent•2005

  • Niche News

    Natalie Jomini Stroud•Niche news•2011

  • Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization

    Levi Boxell, Matthew Gentzkow et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2024

  • How liberalism accommodates far-right social movements

    Open Access•J E C Tetrault•Social Forces•2025

  • Infodemic Pathways

    Open Access•Aengus Bridgman, Eric Merkley et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2021

  • The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections

    Open Access•Nicolas Berlinski, Margaret Doyle et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2021

  • Does the Losing Side Lose the Democratic Faith? Partisan Media Flow and Democratic Values During the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election

    Yiming Wang, Porismita Borah et al.•Political Communication•2024

  • Public Support for Canadian Courts

    Open Access•Erin Crandall, Andrea Lawlor•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2022

  • Camps, not just parties. The dynamic foundations of affective polarization in multi-party systems

    Open Access•Ivo Bantel•Electoral Studies•2023

  • How perceived polarization predicts attitude moralization (and vice versa)

    Chantal D’Amore, Martijn Van Zomeren et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2024

  • Trust in Elections

    Open Access•C Neal Stewart, Charles Stewart•Daedalus•2022

  • Election integrity across Europe

    Open Access•Andreas C Goldberg, Carolina Plescia•European Political Science Review•2024

  • Partisanship and confidence in the vote count

    Open Access•Michael W Sances, Charles Stewart•Electoral Studies•2015

  • From voter ID to party ID

    Open Access•Emily Beaulieu•Electoral Studies•2014

  • The Parties in Our Heads

    Douglas J Ahler, Gaurav Sood•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Slant, Extremity, and Diversity

    Open Access•Yiming Wang, Sang Jung Kim et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2024

  • A Matter of Misunderstanding? Explaining (Mis)Perceptions of Electoral Integrity across 25 Different Nations

    Open Access•R Vliegenthart, Carolien Van Ham et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2024

  • The Global Crisis of Trust in Elections

    Open Access•Nicholas Kerr, Bridgett A King et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2024

  • The Trump Effect? Right-Wing Populism and Distrust in Voting by Mail in Canada

    Open Access•C Wu, A Dawson•Public Opinion Quarterly•2024

  • Political Self-Confidence and Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Carey E Stapleton, Jennifer Wolak•Public Opinion Quarterly•2024

  • The role of affective orientations in promoting perceived polarization

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, A M Enders•Political Science Research and…•2021

  • It’s Largely a Rigged System

    Open Access•Betsy Sinclair, Stephanie S Smith et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief

    Open Access•Libby Jenke•Political Behavior•2024

  • Can Elite Allegations of Election Fraud Demobilize Supporters

    Open Access•Bernard L Fraga, Zachary Peskowitz et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Donald Trump and the Lie

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux, Rory Truex•Perspectives on Politics•2023

  • Do perceptions of electoral malpractice undermine democratic satisfaction? The US in comparative perspective

    Open Access•P Norris•International Political Science…•2019

  • Corruption perceptions

    Open Access•Emily Beaulieu Bacchus, Carew Boulding•Governance•2022

  • Sweet victory, bitter defeat

    Open Access•Lisa Janssen•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • On the front lines of democracy

    Holly Ann Garnett•Democratization•2019

  • Evaluating the Partisan Media Echo Chamber Hypothesis in Canada

    Open Access•Eric Merkley•Canadian Journal of Political…•2025

  • Ideological and Partisan Bias in the Canadian Public

    Open Access•Eric Merkley•Canadian Journal of Political…•2021

  • Affective Polarization in the Canadian Party System, 1988–2021

    Open Access•Richard Johnston•Canadian Journal of Political…•2023

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democracies

    Open Access•Noam Gidron, James Adams et al.•British Journal of Political…•2023

  • Can Official Messaging on Trust in Elections Break Through Partisan Polarization

    Open Access•Jennifer Gaudette, Seth J Hill et al.•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Trump and Trust

    Open Access•Florian Justwan, Ryan D Williamson•PS Political Science & Politics•2022

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Winning cures everything? Beliefs about voter fraud, voter confidence, and the 2016 election

    Open Access•Morris Levy•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Affective polarization in multiparty systems

    Open Access•Markus Wagner•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding

    Open Access•Ann Braley, Gabriel S Lenz et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • How partisan affect shapes citizens' perception of the political world

    Open Access•Dalston G Ward, M Tavits•Electoral Studies•2019

  • Electoral backsliding? Democratic divergence and trajectories in the quality of elections worldwide

    Open Access•Holly Ann Garnett, Toby S James•Electoral Studies•2023

  • Losing predicts perceptions that elections were decided by fraud, but margin of loss and candidate race do not

    Open Access•Cecile Tobin, Ben Aronson et al.•Electoral Studies•2025

  • The 2020 presidential election and beliefs about fraud

    Open Access•A M Enders, Joseph E Uscinski et al.•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham, Milan W Svolik•American Political Science Review•2020

  • Curation Bubbles

    Open Access•Jon Green, Stefan Mccabe et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae