(Mis)information, Polarization, and Trust in Elections
Longitudinal Evidence from Canada
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22763590 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mathieu Lavigne (0000-0003-3408-9923, McGill University), Holly Ann Garnett (0000-0002-2119-4399, Royal Military College of Canada), Aengus Bridgman (0000-0003-1130-1258, McGill University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/poq/nfag035 |
| OpenAlex | W7165395039 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 83 |
Scholars have suggested that we are experiencing a global crisis in trust in elections, with political polarization and misinformation often cited as reasons for distrust. However, empirical evaluations of perceptions of election integrity over time remain scarce. Using data from the Canadian Election Study from 2008 to 2021 and the Media Ecosystem Observatory from 2021, we show that trust in electoral management bodies, measured in terms of confidence, satisfaction, and fairness, has significantly declined since 2019 among Canadians with a right-wing ideology or who support right-wing parties. We find evidence that rising affective polarization, right-wing and social media consumption, and belief in US-based election fraud narratives are associated with significant trust declines in electoral integrity. The results identify key factors linked to the recent politicization of citizens’ perceptions of election fairness and have important implications for the health of our democracy.
Empirical evidence · General election · Ideology · Misinformation · Perception · Polarization (electrochemistry) · Politics · Social media · Survey data collection · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Media and Politics
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Follow the Leader?
American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective
Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms
Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing
The Partisan Brain
Tweeting From Left to Right
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Democracy and the Market
Polarization, Eh?
Populist attitudes and politicians’ disinformation accusations
Electoral integrity matters
Red Media, Blue Media
Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States
In Praise of Skepticism
Why Electoral Integrity Matters
Losers' Consent
Niche News
Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization
How liberalism accommodates far-right social movements
Infodemic Pathways
The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections
Does the Losing Side Lose the Democratic Faith? Partisan Media Flow and Democratic Values During the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
Public Support for Canadian Courts
Camps, not just parties. The dynamic foundations of affective polarization in multi-party systems
How perceived polarization predicts attitude moralization (and vice versa)
Trust in Elections
Election integrity across Europe
Partisanship and confidence in the vote count
From voter ID to party ID
The Parties in Our Heads
Slant, Extremity, and Diversity
A Matter of Misunderstanding? Explaining (Mis)Perceptions of Electoral Integrity across 25 Different Nations
The Global Crisis of Trust in Elections
The Trump Effect? Right-Wing Populism and Distrust in Voting by Mail in Canada
Political Self-Confidence and Affective Polarization
The role of affective orientations in promoting perceived polarization
It’s Largely a Rigged System
Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief
Can Elite Allegations of Election Fraud Demobilize Supporters
Donald Trump and the Lie
Do perceptions of electoral malpractice undermine democratic satisfaction? The US in comparative perspective
Corruption perceptions
Sweet victory, bitter defeat
On the front lines of democracy
Evaluating the Partisan Media Echo Chamber Hypothesis in Canada
Ideological and Partisan Bias in the Canadian Public
Affective Polarization in the Canadian Party System, 1988–2021
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democracies
Can Official Messaging on Trust in Elections Break Through Partisan Polarization
Trump and Trust
Affect, Not Ideology
Winning cures everything? Beliefs about voter fraud, voter confidence, and the 2016 election
Affective polarization in multiparty systems
Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding
How partisan affect shapes citizens' perception of the political world
Electoral backsliding? Democratic divergence and trajectories in the quality of elections worldwide
Losing predicts perceptions that elections were decided by fraud, but margin of loss and candidate race do not
The 2020 presidential election and beliefs about fraud
Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States
Curation Bubbles
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |