Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The role of affective orientations in promoting perceived polarization

Bibliographic Data

ID6342170
AuthorsMiles T Armaly (0000-0001-8945-5797, University of Mississippi, corresponding author), A M Enders (0000-0002-9315-8178, University of Louisville)
Year2021
Volume9
Issue3
Pages615-626
Publication date2021-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Science Research and Methods (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2049-8470 • E-ISSN: 2049-8489
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/psrm.2020.24
OpenAlexW3036723659
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited32

Recent work on political divisions in the mass public has identified several manifestations of polarization linked to different types of attitudes, orientations, and behaviors. Of these, affective polarization and perceived polarization have attracted increasing attention, though we still know fairly little of the links between these variants of polarization. In this paper, we examine the association between affective and perceived polarization, with an aim toward disentangling any potential causal relationship between the two processes. Using two sets of nationally representative panel data from 1992 to 1996 and 2008 to 2009, we find evidence that affective polarization causes perceived polarization, and that perceived polarization is not related to future affective polarization. Stratifying the models by level of political information, we find that the strength and statistical significance of the relationships between past and future values of affective and perceived polarization are conditional on political sophistication: more sophisticated individuals exhibit stronger relationships

Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Sophistication · Chemistry · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • (Mis)information, Polarization, and Trust in Elections

    Open Access•Mathieu Lavigne, Holly Ann Garnett et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2026

  • Lean-back and lean-forward online behaviors

    Open Access•Pablo M Flores, M Hilbert•Computers in Human Behavior•2023

  • We Need to Talk

    Open Access•Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky et al.•We Need to Talk•2023

  • Americans' views of religion in public life

    Open Access•David Sikkink, Greg Wurm•Social Science Research•2026

  • Affective polarization, political mistrust and populist attitudes

    Danilo Serani•Contemporary Italian Politics•2025

  • Surveillance, Disinformation, and Legislative Measures in the 21st Century

    Open Access•Bilge Azgın, Şevki Kıralp•Social Sciences•2024

  • Examining the Territorial Dimension as a Source of Affective Polarization in the Spanish Multinational Democracy

    Daniel Balinhas•Ethnopolitics•2024

  • Implicit attitudes matter for social judgments of others' preference, but do not make those judgments more or less accurate

    Open Access•Janet Lees, Jeffrey Lees•Journal of Experimental Social…•2021

  • Polarization All the Way Down

    Gavin Ploger•Political Communication•2024

  • Misunderstood Differences

    Open Access•Tanisa Tawichsri, Thiti Tosborvorn et al.•Journal of East Asian Studies•2026

  • Affective Polarization and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, A M Enders•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Why Me?’ The Role of Perceived Victimhood in American Politics

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, A M Enders•Political Behavior•2022

  • Perceived Political Party Divide During the Pandemic

    Open Access•Hyungjin Gill, Heysung Lee et al.•International Journal of Public…•2025

  • Perceptions of Partisanship in Local American Politics

    Open Access•Todd Makse, Patrick J Villalonga•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Abating Dissonant Public Spheres

    Homero Gil De Zúñiga, Hugo Marcos-Marne et al.•Political Communication•2023

  • Misperceptions of Out-Partisan Anti-Deliberative Attitudes Shape Partisan Affective and Discursive Preferences

    Open Access•Edward Hohe•Political Behavior•2025

  • The Rule of Law in Red and Blue

    Open Access•Ali S Masood, Ryan Strickler et al.•American Politics Research•2024

  • Do ideologically extreme voters have extreme perceptions of political parties

    Open Access•Javier Padilla•Electoral Studies•2023

  • Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Samara Klar et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2020

  • When polarised feelings towards parties spread to voters

    Open Access•Josep Maria Comellas Bonsfills, Josep M Comellas•Electoral Studies•2022

  • A perspective on judgment and choice

    Daniel Kahneman•American Psychologist•2003

  • An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict

    Henri Tajfel, John Turner•Organizational identity•2000

  • Causal Analysis with Panel Data

    Steven E Finkel, Steven Finkel•Causal analysis with panel data•1995

  • Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States

    Open Access•Jacob Westfall, Leaf Van Boven et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2015

  • Affective Polarization and Ideological Sorting

    Open Access•Yphtach Lelkes•The Forum•2018

  • False polarization

    Open Access•Tim Kenyon•Synthese•2014

  • Political polarization projection

    Leaf Van Boven, Charles M Judd et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2012

  • The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate

    Open Access•Steven W Webster, Alan I Abramowitz•American Politics Research•2017

  • The Parties in Our Heads

    Douglas J Ahler, Gaurav Sood•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Political Sophistication and the Dimensionality of Elite and Mass Attitudes, 1980−2004

    Robert N Lupton, Robert Lupton et al.•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • The Politics of Mate Choice

    John R Alford, Peter K Hatemi et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization

    Douglas J Ahler•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Is Polarization a Myth

    Alan I Abramowitz, Kyle L Saunders•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain

    Open Access•Samara Klar, Yanna Krupnikov et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • Ideologues without Issues

    Open Access•L Mason•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • (Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public

    Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • Explaining Group Influence

    Open Access•Elizabeth Suhay•Political Behavior•2015

  • How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Joseph L Sutherland•Political Behavior•2016

  • The Differential Effects of Actual and Perceived Polarization

    Open Access•A M Enders, Miles T Armaly•Political Behavior•2019

  • Fear and Loathing across Party Lines

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • I Disrespectfully Agree

    Open Access•L Mason•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Political Polarization in the American Public

    Morris P Fiorina, Samuel J Abram et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2008

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Model Uncertainty in Sociological Research

    Open Access•Cristobal Young•American Sociological Review•2009

  • Expressive Partisanship

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy, L Mason et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • An Empirical Examination of Two Theories of Political Perception

    Open Access•Donald Granberg, Jeff Kasmer et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

  • The Perception of Ideological Distance

    Donald Granberg, Thad A Brown•The Western Political Quarterly•1992

  • Model Uncertainty and Robustness

    Open Access•Cristobal Young, Katherine Holsteen•Sociological Methods & Research•2017

Unique citing works20
Citations per year3,33
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae