Enhancing disciplinary voice through feedback-seeking in AI-assisted doctoral writing for publication
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22872015 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Baraa Khuder (0000-0003-2272-2189, Chalmers University of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Applied Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0142-6001 • E-ISSN: 1477-450X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/applin/amaf022 |
| OpenAlex | W4410055167 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 26 |
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are reshaping academic writing, yet their impact on disciplinary voice in writing for publication remains underexplored. This study examines the integration of AI in a writing-for-publication course, using a pedagogical framework that emphasizes human-human interaction to develop feedback-seeking strategies. Fifty-five linguistically and disciplinarily diverse doctoral students engaged in structured activities to explore how AI can support and challenge their disciplinary voices. Through textual analysis of students’ reflections and interactions with AI, findings reveal that while these tools can enhance certain aspects of writing, their effective use requires critical engagement. Feedback-seeking emerged as a key skill, shaping how writers negotiate AI’s role in their writing process—determining when input from AI tools, which operate outside the students’ disciplinary boundaries, strengthens their writing and when disciplinary expertise remains essential. The study highlights the interplay between AI tools, feedback-seeking, and disciplinary voice, offering insights into their pedagogical potential in academic writing and writing for publication.
Academic writing · Applied linguistics · Discipline · Linguistics · Pedagogy · Social science · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Philosophy · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
Ethical awareness versus actual practices
Between innovation and responsibility
A Qualitative Approach to EFL Postgraduates’ GenAI-Assisted Research Writing Within Social Sciences
Towards Iterative Authorship
Modeling AI‐Assisted English Academic Writing
Exploring teacher perspectives on GPT in L2 disciplinary academic writing through the lens of feedback literacy
Academic socialisation through AI and peer feedback in doctoral writing
Integrating GenAI feedback and dialogic peer feedback to improve academic writing performance and revision practices
Mind in Society
Writing and Identity
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum
Disciplinary voices
The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing
Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Diversity and Standards in Writing for Publication in the Age of AI—Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Conceptualising and cultivating Critical GAI Literacy in doctoral academic writing
Feedback-seeking behaviour as a self-regulation strategy in higher education
What Is Ecological Validity? A Dimensional Analysis
Language teacher research engagement
Machine translation as a form of feedback on L2 writing
Formative assessment and self-regulated learning
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |