The Cubit
A History and Measurement Commentary
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23030836 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark H Stone (Aurora University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 2014 |
| Pages | 1-11 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2090-4045 • E-ISSN: 2090-4053 |
| Publisher | Hindawi Limited (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1155/2014/489757 |
| OpenAlex | W2014372329 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 9 |
Historical dimensions for the cubit are provided by scripture and pyramid documentation. Additional dimensions from the Middle East are found in other early documents. Two major dimensions emerge from a history of the cubit. The first is the anthropological or short cubit, and the second is the architectual or long cubit. The wide geographical area and long chronological period suggest that cubit dimensions varied over time and geographic area. Greek and Roman conquests led to standardization. More recent dimensions are provided from a study by Francis Galton based upon his investigations into anthropometry. The subjects for Galton’s study and those of several other investigators lacked adequate sample descriptions for producing a satisfactory cubit/forearm dimension. This finding is not surprising given the demise of the cubit in today’s world. Contemporary dimensions from military and civilian anthropometry for the forearm and hand allow comparison to the ancient unit. Although there appears no pressing need for a forearm-hand/cubit dimension, the half-yard or half-meter unit seems a useful one that could see more application.
Anthropometry · Archaeology · Dimension (graph theory) · Documentation · Forearm · Galton's problem · Genealogy · Geography · Statistics · Computer Science · History · Mathematics · Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies · Medicine
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2023 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |