Confronting suffering with narrative theory, constructed selfhood, and control
Critical perspectives by Simone Weil and Buddhist metaphysics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23035181 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elisa Aaltola (0000-0002-0964-0173, University of Turku, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 227-250 |
| Publication date | 2019-07-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Disability & Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2331-2521 • E-ISSN: 2331-253X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23312521.2019.1567296 |
| OpenAlex | W2912045100 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 10 |
According to the narrative approach, illness and suffering are disruptions that test our ability to retell and govern ourselves. For instance, Arthur Frank and Rita Charon argue that it is via narratives, “selves,” and control that the challenges of illness and affliction can be met. The author explores this approach in light of Simone Weil’s philosophy and Zen Buddhist thought, both of which question the primacy of selfhood, control, and discourse. Using disability as a case study, the author argues that both Weil and Zen Buddhist philosophy offer a radical alternative to narrative ethics, worthy of further scrutiny.
Buddhism · Epistemology · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Narrative · Psychoanalysis · Scrutiny · Sociology · Theology · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |