Major Contemporary Approaches to the Analysis of the Vietnamese Simple Clause
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23038679 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nguyen Thi Tu Trinh (0009-0006-5297-0334), Phan Van Hoa (University of Da Nang), Tran Huu Phuc (University of Da Nang) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | VNU Journal of Foreign Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2525-2445 • E-ISSN: 2525-2445 |
| Publisher | Vietnam National University of Languages and International Studies (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4212 |
| OpenAlex | W2777124876 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
Clause as a grammatical category has been at the centre of attention throughout most of the history of linguistics in Vietnam and has caused a lot of troubles for analysis and interpretation. Great efforts have been made to shed light on this matter. There is, however, no consensus among Vietnamese linguists on clause analysis and interpretation because each of them seems to work on clause analysis in a variety of approaches using different frameworks. In this paper, we aim at investigating some major contemporary approaches to the analysis of the Vietnamese simple clause with our critical appraisals of each approach toprovide readers with an overview of Vietnamese clause studies. The study reveals that at present structuralapproaches influenced by European and American structuralists such as Saussure and Bloomfeld, andfunctional approaches influenced by Dik’s functional grammar and Halliday’s systemic functional grammarseem to be the dominant grammatical models for the analysis of the Vietnamese simple clause.
Dependent clause · Epistemology · Grammar · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Relative clause · Sentence · Simple (philosophy) · Vietnamese · Computer Science · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |