Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Angela K.-y. Leung , Donna J. Yao , Melody M. Chao
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Singapore Management University, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR
ANO 2019
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
ISSN 0022-0221
E-ISSN 1552-5422
EDITORA SAGE Publications
DOI 10.1177/0022022119835058
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 7458d826a52abb964bd942e286164430

Resumo

Essentialism, a fundamental belief of the fixedness of social group essences, is often associated with negative intergroup outcomes. However, research is yet to explore the role of essentialism in intergroup conflicts, despite their prevalence. To address this gap, we conducted the first direct examination on how essentialism influences conflict management toward out-group members. Moreover, we examined perspective-taking as a positive factor in improving conflict management among essentialist individuals relative to their non-essentialist counterparts in intergroup contexts. Results across three experiments provided little support to the negative effect of essentialism on intergroup (vs. intragroup) conflict management. Yet, we found that perspective-taking promoted the use of problem solving and improved one's own gain and the dyad's joint gain among essentialist individuals, but not non-essentialist individuals, in intergroup (vs. intragroup) conflict situations. This research suggests that when coupled with perspective-taking, essentialism can promote constructive conflict resolution in intergroup contexts.

Ferramentas