On the Relationship between Economic Development and Political Democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID23155486
AuthorsJohn E Roemer (0000-0001-9049-5083, University of California System), Salvador Barberà (0000-0001-6586-2398, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona)
Year1995
Pages28-57
Publication date1995-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueDemocracy and Development (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan UK (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/978-1-349-24076-0_2
OpenAlexW2027241737
ISBN9781349240760
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited3

Until the mid 1970s, with the notable exceptions of India and Costa Rica, only highly developed economies enjoyed political democracy. Many theories have been proposed to explain this apparent relationship between development and democracy. I think they can be divided into two groups. The first consists of those theories based upon the growth of the power of a class, or the formation of a coalition of classes, in whose interests democracy, or extending the franchise to the masses, lies. Some argue, for instance, that the working class is the engine of democratic transformation, and working class power grows with development, which induces the formation of trade unions. Others argue that the bourgeoisie is the engine of democratic transformation — they need the masses to side with them against the landed aristocracy, and the bourgeoisie grows with development. For theories of this kind, Moore (1966) and Stephens (1994) provide a cogent account. The second category of theories explains the advent of democracy by some kind of change of preferences of citizens. For instance, with education, people come to value civil liberties more, and there is, therefore, an obvious relation between development and democratic yearnings.

Aristocracy (class) · Bourgeoisie · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Middle class · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Law · Political Economy and Marxism

Tools

Open DOISci-HubLibgen