Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The autonomy of ethics

Bibliographic Data

ID23165993
AuthorsA N Prior (University of Manchester, corresponding author)
Year1960
Volume38
Issue3
Pages199-206
Publication date1960-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralasian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-8402 • E-ISSN: 1470-6828
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00048406085200221
OpenAlexW2090888310
LanguageEN
Citations received35

(1960). The autonomy of ethics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 199-206.

Autonomy · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Sociology · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology

  • On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism

    Open Access•Antoni Diller•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2013

  • Anscombe on `Ought

    Charles Pigden•The Philosophical Quarterly•1988

  • The autonomy of evaluation

    Open Access•David Collingridge•The Journal of Value Inquiry•1980

  • I Ought, Therefore I Can

    Open Access•Peter B M Vranas•Philosophical Studies•2007

  • Logic and the autonomy of ethics

    Charles Pigden, Charles R Pigden•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1989

  • Plato’s Cosmology and Its Ethical Dimensions

    Open Access•Gabriela Roxana Carone, Donald J Zeyl•Aestimatio Sources and Studies in…•2015

  • Plato's Cosmology and its Ethical Dimensions

    Open Access•Gabriela Roxana Carone•Plato's Cosmology and Its Ethical…•2005

  • The gap between ‘is’ and ‘should’

    Max Black•Is-Ought Question•1969

  • Giving up Hume's Guillotine

    Aaron Wolf•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2014

  • Non-Naturalist Moral Realism, Autonomy and Entanglement

    Open Access•Graham Oddie•Topoi•2017

  • Naturalistic Moral Realism and Evolutionary Biology

    Open Access•Paul Bloomfield•Philosophies•2021

  • Why Do We “Must” and “Should”?—Bridging the Gap from “Is” to “Ought”

    Chen Bo•Social Sciences in China•2025

  • The Reliable Route from Nonmoral Evidence to Moral Conclusions

    Open Access•Neil Sinhababu•Erkenntnis•2024

  • Arthur N. Prior on ‘Unquestionably the Best Logical Symbolism for Most Purposes’

    Jeremiah Joven Joaquin•History and Philosophy of Logic•2022

  • The fundamental reason for reasons fundamentalism

    Open Access•Mark Schroeder•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • On the (in)significance of Hume’s Law

    Open Access•Samuele Chilovi, Daniel Wodak•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • The Limits of Self-Effacement

    Open Access•Patrick Clipsham•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Interlocking content and attitude

    VÍCTOR M VERDEJO, Javier González De Prado Salas et al.•Inquiry•2021

  • The I in logic

    Open Access•Gillian Russell•Theoria•2024

  • The Importance of Roles in the Skill Analogy

    Open Access•Matt Dougherty•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2020

  • Two Versions of Hume's Law

    Open Access•Campbell Brown•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2015

  • Moral Knowledge by Deduction

    Open Access•Declan Smithies•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2021

  • Expressivism and moral independence

    Open Access•Elliot Salinger•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2023

  • Expressivism, Inferentialism, and Saving the Debate

    Open Access•Matthew Chrisman•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2008

  • The is-ought gap and the substitution criterion

    M Chen•South African Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • Rebutting formally valid counterexamples to the Humean “is-ought” dictum

    Open Access•Daniel Guevara•Synthese•2008

  • Prior and the basis of ethics

    Open Access•J J C Smart•Synthese•1982

  • No normative free lunch

    Open Access•Singa Behrens•Synthese•2021

  • Twelve great papers

    Open Access•Gerhard Schurz•Synthese•2020

  • Truthmaking and the is–ought gap

    Open Access•Kit Fine•Synthese•2021

  • Introduction to the special issue “Logical perspectives on science and cognition”

    Open Access•Christian J Feldbacher-Escamilla, Alexander Gebharter et al.•Synthese•2020

  • Prior’s Thank-Goodness Argument Reconsidered

    Open Access•Matt La Vine•Synthese•2016

  • Barriers to Entailment

    Yuna Won•The Philosophical Review•2025

  • Against inferential moral knowledge

    Open Access•M Backes•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Against Essential Mental Normativity Again

    Open Access•Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen•Dialogue•2011

Unique citing works35
Citations per year0,61
Citation span1969 - 2025 (57)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 32

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae