Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy

Bibliographic Data

ID23186162
AuthorsGeorge E Karamanolis (corresponding author)
EditorsGeorge Karamanolis (0000-0002-4050-716X), Vasilis Politis (0000-0002-2396-481X)
Year2017
Publication date2017-12-28
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueAporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/9781316274293
OpenAlexW2775959755
ISBN9781316274293
Open LibraryOL34727832M
LanguageEN
Citations received13

Ancient philosophers from an otherwise diverse range of traditions were connected by their shared use of aporia - translated as puzzlement rooted in conflicts of reasons - as a core tool in philosophical enquiry. The essays in this volume provide the first comprehensive study of aporetic methodology among numerous major figures and influential schools, including the Presocratics, Plato, Aristotle, Plutarch, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Academic sceptics, Pyrrhonian sceptics, Plotinus and Damascius. They explore the differences and similarities in these philosophers' approaches to the source, structure, and aim of aporia, their views on its function and value, and ideas about the proper means of generating such a state among thinkers who were often otherwise opposed in their overall philosophical orientation. Discussing issues of method, dialectic, and knowledge, the volume will appeal to those interested in ancient philosophy and in philosophical enquiry more generally.

Art · Art history · Literature · Classical Philosophy and Thought · History · ancient · Ancient Philosophy · Aporia · Methodology · Philosophy

  • The Filioque as an Over-Thousand-Year-Old Aporia in Orthodox–Catholic Relations

    Open Access•Krzysztof Leśniewski•Religions•2026

  • Virtue and Our Way of Death

    Open Access•Jennifer Ryan Lockhart•European Journal of Philosophy•2025

  • Aristotelian perplexity and well-being, then and now

    Open Access•Nicholas Jardine•Interdisciplinary Science Reviews•2024

  • Why are Galen’s Relational Syllogisms Relational

    Open Access•Matyáš Havrda•History and Philosophy of Logic•2025

  • Aristotle’s Conception of Dialectical Syllogism in Topics VIII 4

    Fernando Martins Mendonça•Phronesis•2025

  • The Didactic Oracle

    Rebecca A Frank•Mnemosyne•2023

  • The nature of Sextan suspension

    Open Access•Benoit Guilielmo•Inquiry•2025

  • Plato, Sophist 259c7–d7

    Open Access•John D Proios•The Classical Quarterly•2023

  • The New Politics of Olympos

    Michael Brumbaugh•New Politics of Olympos•2019

  • Shifting Epistemological Perspectives in Ptolemy’s Harmonics

    Open Access•Andrew Barker•Music and Philosophy in the Roman…•2020

  • Becoming Godlike

    Open Access•David Sedley•Cambridge Companion to Ancient…•2017

  • Horace and Practical Philosophy

    Open Access•Terence Irwin•Cambridge Companion to Ancient…•2017

  • Music and Philosophy in the Roman Empire

    Open Access•Francesco Pelosi, Federico M Petrucci•Music and Philosophy in the Roman…•2020

Citations per year1.44
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae