Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Armenian morphosyntactic alignment in diachrony

Bibliographic Data

ID23200501
AuthorsRobin Meyer (0000-0002-1177-0639, Center for Applied Linguistics, corresponding author)
Year2022
Pages277-299
Publication date2022-08-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueAlignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780198857907.003.0009
OpenAlexW4296626965
ISBN9780198857907
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited146

This chapter outlines the development of morphosyntactic alignment in Armenian from its pre-attested stage to modern forms of the language. For the most part, Armenian follows a nominative–accusative alignment pattern; the only exception occurs in the periphrastic perfect in Classical Armenian. This tense shows tripartite alignment: subjects are marked as nominative, agents as genitive, and objects as accusative. This alignment split prevails until the end of the Classical Armenian period. The origin of this alignment pattern lies in the contact with the West Middle Iranian language Parthian from which Armenian has borrowed heavily in several linguistic domains. The Armenian perfect and its alignment are the grammaticalised result of pattern replication, by which the Parthian ergative–absolutive past tense is borrowed into Armenian and there realised by means of the participle. The change from ergative–absolutive to tripartite alignment is based on morphosyntactic reanalysis of the object case.

Armenian · Demonstrative · Ergative case · Genitive case · Linguistics · Nominative case · Noun · Object (grammar) · Participle · Verb · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Towards a Typology of Contact‐Induced Change

    Open Access•Robin Meyer•Transactions of the Philological…•2023

  • Antoine Meillet, parrain de la linguistique arménienne

    Robin Meyer•Études de lettres•2023

  • Homer

    Open Access•G S Kirk•The Cambridge History of…•1985

  • Towards a chronology of early Greek epic

    Open Access•Martin West, M L West•Relative Chronology in Early…•2011

  • Language Contact and Grammatical Change

    Open Access•Bernd Heine, Tania Kuteva•Language Contact and Grammatical…•2005

  • Word Meaning and Montague Grammar

    Open Access•David R Dowty•Word Meaning and Montague Grammar•1979

  • Verb Meaning and the Lexicon

    Open Access•Gillian Ramchand, Gillian Catriona Ramchand•Verb Meaning and the Lexicon•2008

  • Prototypical Transitivity

    Åshild Næss•Prototypical Transitivity…•2007

  • World Lexicon of Grammaticalization

    Open Access•Bernd Heine, Tania Kuteva et al.•World Lexicon of Grammaticalization•2002

  • Scalar Structure Underlies Telicity in "Degree Achievements"

    Open Access•J Hay, Claire Kennedy et al.•Proceedings from Semantics and…•1999

  • From Etymology to Pragmatics

    Eve E Sweetser, Eve Sweetser•From Etymology to Pragmatics•2012

  • Anatolian morphosyntax

    Annette Teffeteller•Perspectives on historical syntax•2015

  • Obliqueness, quasi-subjects and transitivity in Baltic and Slavonic

    Axel Holvoet•The diachronic typology of…•2013

  • Studies on the Collective and Feminine in Indo-European from a Diachronic and Typological Perspective

    Sergio Neri, Roland Schuhmann•Studies on the collective and…•2014

  • Another quadruplet therapy for multiple myeloma

    Open Access•Romano Lazzeroni, Natalie Scott Callander•The Lancet Haematology•2024

  • Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic

    Axel Holvoet, Nicole Nau•Grammatical relations and their…•2014

  • Archaic Syntax in Indo-European

    Brigitte L M Bauer, Brigitte Bauer•Archaic Syntax in Indo-European•2000

  • Middle Voice in Latin and the phenomenon of Split Intransitivity

    Chiara Gianollo•Journal of Latin Linguistics•2005

  • Alignment Change in Iranian Languages

    Geoffrey Haig, Geoffrey L J Haig•Alignment Change in Iranian…•2008

  • The origin of the Proto-Indo-European gender system

    Silvia Luraghi•Folia Linguistica•2011

  • Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective

    Eystein Dahl, Krzysztof Stroński•Indo-Aryan Ergativity in…•2016

  • Language Typology and Language Universals

    Ekkehard König, Eberhard König et al.•Language Typology and Language…•2021

  • Remarks on the Sanskrit passive

    Gonda Gonda•Remarks on the Sanskrit passive•1951

  • Historische Grammatik des Kilikisch-Armenischen

    Josef Karst•Historische Grammatik des…•1901

  • Impersonal constructions and accusative subjects in Late Latin

    Michela Cennamo•Impersonal constructions•2011

  • Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective

    Open Access•Alice C Harris, Lyle Campbell•Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguist…•1995

  • Syntax, sociolinguistics, and literary genres

    Pierluigi Cuzzolin, Gerd V M Haverling et al.•Syntax of the Sentence•2009

  • Septic Dislocation of Hip After Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur

    Michael S Sridhar, Romano Lazzeroni et al.•JBJS Case Connector•2021

  • Evidential, raised possessor, and the historical source of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian

    Open Access•Theodora Bynon•Transactions of the Philological…•2005

  • Non-canonical subject marking

    Daniel Kölligan•The diachronic typology of…•2013

  • Infinitive im R̥gveda

    Götz Keydana•Infinitive im R̥gveda•2013

  • New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin

    Andrew L Sihler•New comparative grammar of Greek…•1995

  • Social Variation and the Latin Language

    Open Access•J N Adams, J Ν Adams•Social Variation and the Latin…•2013

  • From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic

    Don Ringe•From Proto-Indo-European to…•2017

  • A Sanskrit Grammar, including Both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brahmana

    William Dwight Whitney•The American Journal of Philology•1880

  • The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects

    Леонид Куликов, L I Kulikov et al.•The diachronic typology of…•2013

  • Old Avestan Syntax and Stylistics

    Martin West, M L West•Old Avestan Syntax and Stylistics•2011

  • Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft

    Manfred Mayrhofer, Michael Meier-Brügger et al.•Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft•2000

  • Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change

    Alan Timberlake•Mechanisms of Syntactic Change•1977

  • On the origin of non-nominative subjects

    Anoop Mahajan, Anoop K Mahajan•Typological Studies in Language•2004

  • Vedische und Sanskrit-Syntax

    Jacob Samuel Speyer•Vedische und Sanskrit-Syntax•1896

  • The Ancient Greek partitive genitive in typological perspective

    Luz Conti, Silvia Luraghi•Partitive cases and related…•2014

  • Patterns of ‘Active’ Syntax in Late Latin Pleonastic Reflexives

    Michela Cennamo•Historical Linguistics (Current…•2000

  • The origin of the oblique-subject construction

    Jóhanna Barðdal, Þórhallur Eyþórsson•Grammatical change in Indo-European…•2009

  • Dative experiencer constructions as a Circum-Baltic isogloss

    Ilja A Seržant•Contemporary Approaches to Baltic…•2015

  • Passive to anticausative through impersonalization

    Leonid Kulikov, Леонид Куликов•Impersonal constructions•2011

  • Zum umschriebenen Perfekt in indogermanischen Sprachen

    Karl Horst Schmidt•Indogermanische Forschungen•1962

  • Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time

    J Nichols•Linguistic Diversity in Space and…•1992

  • Partitive Subjects and Objects in Indo-Iranian and beyond

    Eystein Dahl•Partitive cases and related…•2014

  • The Chain of Being and Having in Slavic

    Steven J Clancy•The chain of being and having in…•2010

  • An Indo-European Linguistic Area and its Characteristics

    Calvert Watkins•Areal diffusion and genetic…•2001

  • Passive auxiliaries in Late Latin

    Michela Cennamo•Latin et Langues Romanes•2005

  • Alignment shift as functional markedness reversal

    Open Access•Katarzyna Janic, Charlotte Hemmings•Journal of Historical Linguistics•2021

  • Alignment Change and the Emergence of the Thematic Conjugation from Proto‐Indo‐European to Indo‐European

    Open Access•Roland A Pooth, Verónica Orqueda•Transactions of the Philological…•2021

  • Alignment and word order in Old Japanese

    Open Access•Yuko Yanagida, John Whitman•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2009

  • Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence

    Yaron Matras, Jeanette Sakel•Studies in Language•2007

  • The Grammaticization of Passive Morphology

    Martin Haspelmath•Studies in Language•1990

  • Active transitive impersonals in Slavic and beyond

    Open Access•Katrin Schlund•Russian Linguistics•2020

  • Evolutionary dynamics of Indo-European alignment patterns

    Open Access•Gerd Carling, Chundra Cathcart•Diachronica•2021

  • Traces of non-nominative alignment in Lithuanian

    Open Access•Silvia Piccini•Baltistica•2008

  • Split Ergativity in Hurrian

    Dennis Campbell, Dennis R M Campbell•Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und…•2008

  • Split-ergativity in Hittite

    Petra Goedegebuure•Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und…•2013

  • The impersonal verb construction in Australian languages

    Michael Walsh•Language topics•1987

  • On the typology of state/change of state alternations

    Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Andrew Koontz‐garboden•Yearbook of Morphology 2005…•2005

  • A synopsis of role and reference grammar

    Robert D Van Valin•Advances in Role and Reference…•1992

  • The Quest for Cognates

    Jóhanna Barðdal, Thomas Smitherman•Language Dynamics and Change•2013

  • Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain

    Open Access•Ilja A Seržant•Baltic Linguistics•2013

  • Ergativity and Language Contact on the Oregon Coast

    Open Access•Marianne Mithun•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•2000

  • Verb-Valency in Contemporary Polish

    Open Access•Mark J Elson, Lea Sawicki•Modern Language Journal•1990

  • Notes On Some Lexical Correspondences Between Armenian and the Kartvelian Languages

    Gevorg Djahukian•Iran and the Caucasus•2003

  • Metonymy

    Open Access•Zoltán Kövecses, Günter Radden•Cognitive Linguistics•1998

  • Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German

    Open Access•Jóhanna Barðdal•Cognitive Linguistics•2006

  • Control and decontrol in acehnese

    Mark Durie•Australian Journal of Linguistics•1985

  • The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions

    Open Access•Margarita Su er, Margarita Su�er•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1988

  • Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans

    Open Access•Carol F Justus, Thomas V Gamkrelidze et al.•Language•1996

  • From Indo-European to Latin

    Open Access•John Hewson, Helena Kurzová•Language•1994

  • The Linguistic Relationship between Armenian and Greek

    John A C Greppin, James Clackson•Language•1996

  • On the Hittite Words for 'Year' and the Seasons and for 'Night' and 'Day

    Albrecht Goetze•Language•1951

  • Zero Syntax

    Christopher D Manning, Christopher Manning et al.•Language•1997

  • The Problem of Ukrainian-Polish Linguistic Relations from the Tenth to the Fourteenth Century

    Yury Šerech-Shevelov•WORD•1952

  • A Short Grammar of Lithuanian

    William R Schmalstieg, Terje Mathiassen•The Slavic and East European…•1997

  • Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization

    Open Access•Michela Cennamo, Thorhallur Eythorsson et al.•Linguistics•2015

  • The Latin Impersonal Passive

    Harm Pinkster•Mnemosyne•1992

  • Agents in Latin Impersonal Passives

    Silvia Pieroni•Mnemosyne•2000

  • The demise of the Old English impersonal construction

    Open Access•Olga Fischer, Olga C M Fischer et al.•Journal of Linguistics•1983

  • The change that never happened

    Open Access•Jóhanna Barðdal, Thorhallur Eythorsson et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2003

  • Accusative Subjects in Avestan

    Serena Danesi•Indo-Iranian Journal•2014

  • Latin Syntax and Semantics

    Lee T Pearcy, Harm Pinkster•The Classical World•1994

  • On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistic Typology•2011

  • A typological perspective on Differential Object Marking

    Open Access•Kaius Sinnemäki•Linguistics•2014

  • Contributions to the History of Verb-Inflection in Sanskrit

    John Avery•Journal of the American Oriental…•1872

  • The diachrony of morphosyntactic alignment

    Open Access•Federico Zúñiga•Language and Linguistics Compass•2018

  • Spanish Quirky Subjects, Person Restrictions, and the Person-Case Constraint

    Maria-Luisa Rivero, María Luisa Rivero•Linguistic Inquiry•2004

  • Two Types of Impersonal Sentences in Spanish

    Open Access•Olga Fernández‐soriano•Syntax•1999

  • Language in Armenian American communities

    Talar Chahinian, Anny Bakalian•International Journal of the…•2016

  • On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns

    Open Access•Edith A Moravcsik•Lingua•1978

  • Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective

    Open Access•William B Mcgregor•Lingua•2010

  • The decay of ergativity in Pamir languages

    Open Access•John Payne, John R Payne•Lingua•1980

  • Labile verbs in Late Latin

    Open Access•Chiara Gianollo•Linguistics•2014

  • On the Character of Languages of Active Typology

    Open Access•Georgiĭ Andreevich Klimov•Linguistics•1974

  • Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistics•2021

  • Referential hierarchies

    Open Access•Spike Gildea, Federico Zúñiga et al.•Linguistics•2016

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOILibgenOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae