Hegel in the Americas
Interpretive Assimilation and the Anticolonial Argument
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23213408 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kevin J Harrelson (0000-0002-0228-4014, Ball State University, corresponding author), Kevin Harrelson |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 27 |
| Publication date | 2019-12-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista Eletrônica Estudos Hegelianos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1980-8372 • E-ISSN: 1980-8372 |
| Publisher | Sociedade Hegel Brasileira (PUBLISHER • BR) |
| DOI | 10.70244/reh.v16i27.339 |
| OpenAlex | W2997964166 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
This essay criticizes some strategies of Hegel scholarship, especially the non-metaphysical school and its recent metaphysical successor. My main claim is that these approaches are rhetorically opaque, and thus vulnerable to a certain anticolonial argument. In place of these strategies, I recommend and illustrate a more historically perspicuous approach that is sensitive to concerns about the role of European philosophy in the Americas.
Argument (complex analysis) · Assimilation (phonology) · Epistemology · Hegelianism · Linguistics · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · History · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political Philosophy and Ethics
A Companion to Latin American Philosophy
What is the Non-Metaphysical Reading of Hegel? A Reply to Frederick Beiser
Hegel's idea of a conceptual scheme∗
Hegel’s Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Politics
Kreines on the Problem of Metaphysics in Kant and Hegel
The Nazi tradition
The Rise of American Philosophy
Karl Popper, the Vienna Circle, and Red Vienna
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |