Misunderstanding Faith
When ‘Capital’ does not fit the ‘Spiritual’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23239495 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francesca Eva Sara Montemaggi (0000-0001-7916-4611, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 179-192 |
| Publication date | 2010-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences Annual Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1833-1882 • E-ISSN: 2474-2260 |
| Publisher | Common Ground Research Networks (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v05i05/51728 |
| OpenAlex | W2150382803 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
In the past decade, UK government policy and academic research have inserted faith based organisations (FBOs) within the discourse of community cohesion and regeneration. This has been articulated primarily within a social capital framework which understands FBOs as ‘repositories’ of resources to tap into (Home Office 2004). The present paper outlines a critique of social capital as framework for the understanding of FBOs, and of the emerging concept of spiritual capital as the ‘social capital of faith organisations’ (Stark and Finke 2000). The paper will also sketch an alternative theoretical framework inspired by the work of Georg Simmel on religion. Robert Putnam’s version of social capital has been spectacularly successful; yet it has been shown to be utopian and fraught with inconsistencies. This paper argues that social capital has become a highly moralised notion and, as such, it cannot be applied productively. Further, I shall maintain that the economic analogy, made by the terminology of capital, is particularly ill-suited to faith organisations, and that the resulting concept of ‘spiritual capital’ leads to a fundamental misunderstanding of what is distinctive of faith. Drawing on Georg Simmel’s sociology of religion, the paper will provide an initial sketch of an alternative conceptualisation of faith for a deeper understanding of individual religiosity and the relationship between the individual and the community. Simmel’s insights on the relational nature of religiosity shed light onto the distinctiveness of religiosity offering better grounding for researching faith communities.
Art · Business · Capital (architecture) · Faith · Sociology · Theology · Visual arts · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2023 (13) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |