Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

“Compensate the Losers?” Economic Policy and the Origins of U.S. Partisan Realignment

Bibliographic Data

ID23252240
AuthorsIlyana Kuziemko (Boston University, corresponding author), Nicolas Longuet-Marx (Boston University), Naidu (0000-0002-9774-1678, Boston University), Suresh Naidu
Year2023
Publication date2023-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeREPORT
VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research (REPOSITORY)
PublisherNational Bureau of Economic Research (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3386/w31794
OpenAlexW4387868192
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited35

We argue that the Democratic Party’s evolution on economic policy helps explain partisan realignment by education. We show that less-educated Americans differentially demand “predistribution” policies (e.g., a federal jobs guarantee, higher minimum wages, protectionism, and stronger unions), while more-educated Americans differentially favor redistribution (taxes and transfers). This educational gradient in policy preferences has been largely unchanged since the 1940s. We then show the Democrats’ supply of predistribution has declined since the 1970s. We tie this decline to the rise of a self-described “New Democrat” party faction who court more educated voters and are explicitly skeptical of predistribution. Consistent with this faction’s growing influence, we document the significant growth of donations from highly educated donors, especially from out-of-district donors, who play an increasingly important role in Democratic (especially “New Democrat”) primary campaigns relative to Republican primaries. In response to these within-party changes in power, less-educated Americans began to leave the Democratic Party in the 1970s, after decades of serving as the party’s base. Roughly half of the total shift can be explained by their changing views of the parties’ economic policies. We also show that in the crucial transition period of the 1970s and 1980s, New Democrat-aligned candidates draw disproportionately from more-educated voters in both survey questions and actual Congressional elections.

Economics · Political economy · Political science · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Do working-class candidates activate class-based voting

    Open Access•Jonathan Abbott, Fred Deveaux•Electoral Studies•2024

  • The Crisis of Democratic Capitalism

    Doug Elmendorf•Journal of Economic Literature•2024

  • Black Congressional Politics

    Christian Hosam•Politics Groups and Identities•2025

  • Cobots as Workforce Partners

    Open Access•Lindsay Jacobs, Bilge Mutlu et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2025

  • The Wisconsin Progressives on Moral Failure, Market Failure, and Inequality

    Marianne Johnson•International Journal of…•2025

  • Will the Twain Ever Meet? Bridging the Gap Between Economics and Politics

    Open Access•Alan S Blinder•The Annals of the American…•2024

  • Voting for trade protectionist parties

    Open Access•Enrique García-Viñuela, Nicolas Motz et al.•European Union Politics•2024

  • Why Do High-Income Democrats Support Redistribution? The Roles of Partisanship, Racial Attitudes and Fiscal Populism

    Open Access•Karyn Vilbig•British Journal of Sociology•2025

  • Southern Nation

    Open Access•David A Bateman, David Bateman et al.•Southern Nation•2018

  • Why the poor do not expropriate the rich

    Open Access•John E Roemer•Journal of Public Economics•1998

  • Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices

    Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M Shapiro et al.•Econometrica•2019

  • Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes

    Jushan Bai, Pierre Perron•Econometrica•1998

  • The Theory of Moral Sentiments

    Adam Smith•The Two Narratives of Political…•2010

  • Greedy function approximation

    Jerome H Friedman•The Annals of Statistics•2001

  • Polarized America

    Adam Bonica, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Polarized America•2016

  • Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?

    Open Access•Adam Bonica, Nolan Mccarty et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2013

  • Why Did the Democrats Lose the South? Bringing New Data to an Old Debate

    Ilyana Kuziemko, Ebonya Washington•American Economic Review•2018

  • Racism and redistribution in the United States

    Open Access•Woojin Lee, John E Roemer•Journal of Public Economics•2006

  • Democracy, Redistribution, and Inequality

    Open Access•Daron Acemoglu, Naidu et al.•Handbook of Income Disribution•2015

  • How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments

    Ilyana Kuziemko, Michael I Norton et al.•American Economic Review•2015

  • Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure

    David Autor, David Dorn et al.•American Economic Review•2020

  • Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution

    Alberto Alesina, Stefanie Stantcheva et al.•American Economic Review•2018

  • Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution

    Open Access•Guillermo Cruces, Ricardo Pérez-Truglia et al.•Journal of Public Economics•2012

  • Bias in Cable News

    Gary J Martins, Gregory J Martin et al.•American Economic Review•2017

  • Fighting Climate Change

    Open Access•Antoine Dechezleprêtre, Alexandre Fabre et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2022

  • Why Is Europe More Equal than the United States

    Thomas Blanchet, Lucas Chancel et al.•American Economic Journal Applied…•2022

  • Brahmin Left Versus Merchant Right

    Open Access•Amory Gethin, Clara Martínez-Toledano et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2021

  • Pivotal Decade

    Benjamin C Waterhouse•Labor Studies in Working-Class…•2011

  • What It Took to Win

    Elizabeth Tandy Shermer•Labor Studies in Working-Class…•2023

  • Ideal Points and American Political Development

    Open Access•David A Bateman, John S Lapinski et al.•Studies in American Political…•2016

  • No Balance in the Equities”

    Open Access•David J Sousa, David Sousa•Studies in American Political…•1999

  • The Triumph of Broken Promises

    Open Access•Christopher Vials•Journal of American History•2024

  • Keeping Up with the Joneses

    Open Access•Mitchell Killian, Ryan Schoen et al.•Political Behavior•2008

  • How Unusual Was 2016? Flipping Counties, Flipping Voters, and the Education–Party Correlation since 1952

    Open Access•Michael W Sances•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • The Brexit vote

    Sara B Hobolt•Journal of European Public Policy•2016

  • Mapping the Ideological Marketplace

    Open Access•Adam Bonica•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Inferring Roll‐Call Scores from Campaign Contributions Using Supervised Machine Learning

    Open Access•Adam Bonica•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace

    Open Access•Adam Bonica•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century

    Henry S Farber, Henry Farber et al.•National Bureau of Economic…•2018

  • True Blues

    Open Access•Kevin Mattson•Journal of American History•2022

  • Mindful Economics

    Open Access•Roland Bénabou, Jean Tirole•The Journal of Economic…•2016

  • Secular Partisan Realignment in the United States

    Open Access•Herbert Kitschelt, Herbert P Kitschelt et al.•Latin American Politics and Society•2019

Unique citing works8
Citations per year4
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae