Two Equivalent Discrepancy Functions for Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Do Their Test Statistics Follow a Non-Central Chi-Square Distribution under Model Misspecification
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2330441 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulf Olsson (0000-0002-5972-1764), Ulf Henning Olsson, Tron Fo, Tron Foss (Norwegian School of Management BI), Einar Breivik (Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 453-500 |
| Publication date | 2004-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociological Methods & Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0049-1241 • E-ISSN: 1552-8294 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0049124103258131 |
| OpenAlex | W2067708868 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 18 |
Over the years several discrepancy functions have been introduced both in the literature and in the software of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The test statistics for the discrepancy functions associated with Maximum Likelihood (ML), Generalized Least Squares (GLS), and Normal Theory Weighted Least Squares (NWLS) are all asymptotically equivalent. These test statistics are all approximately distributed as central chi-square under correct model specification and if the observed variables are multivariate normally distributed. However, it is known that the distribution of these test statistics will not approximate a central Chi-square distribution for models containing specification error, but is more likely to follow a non-central Chi-square distribution (Browne 1984). This study investigates the empirical distributions of the ML and NWLS discrepancy functions. The study includes 13 different factor models with different types and degrees of specification error. It is found, except for small samples, that the empirical distribution of the ML-test statistic outperforms the empirical distribution of the NWLS-test statistic in terms of approximation to the theoretical non-central Chi-square distribution. Furthermore, in some cases, it turned out that the non-central Chi-square approximation was not appropriate even for models that contained minor and moderate degrees of specification error
Chi-square test · Confidence interval · Empirical distribution function · Empirical likelihood · Likelihood-ratio test · Pearson's chi-squared test · Square (algebra) · Statistic · Statistical hypothesis testing · Statistics · Test statistic · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques · Applied Mathematics · Mathematics · Statistical Methods and Applications
Mediating Mechanisms in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Childhood OCD
Structural Equation Modeling
Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Competencias Socioemocionales SEC-Q en estudiantes universitarios chilenos
Parceling to Lower Indicator-to-Sample-Size Ratio? Instead Try Correcting Your SEM Chi-Square for High p and Modest N to Obtain a Nominal Type I Error Rate Without Parcel-Allocation Variability
Social and biological intergroup hierarchy beliefs
Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness
Noncentral Chi-Square Versus Normal Distributions in Describing the Likelihood Ratio Statistic
Make Some Noise
Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics
Normal Versus Noncentral Chi-square Asymptotics of Misspecified Models
An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models
An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentrality
On the Multivariate Asymptotic Distribution of Sequential Chi-Square Statistics
Asymptotically distribution‐free methods for the analysis of covariance structures
Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification
Representing sources of error in the common-factor model
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Improper Solutions in Structural Equation Models
| Citations per year | 0.52 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2005 - 2026 (22) |
| Highly cited | No |