Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Doorstep Interactions and Interviewer Effects on the Process Leading to Cooperation or Refusal

Bibliographic Data

ID2330719
AuthorsGabriele B Durrant (0009-0001-3436-1512, Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute (S3RI), University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, corresponding author), Julia D’arrigo (Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute (S3RI), University of Southampton, Southampton, UK)
Year2014
Volume43
Issue3
Pages490-518
Publication date2014-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Methods & Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0049-1241 • E-ISSN: 1552-8294
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0049124114521148
OpenAlexW2102249371
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited24

This article presents an analysis of interviewer effects on the process leading to cooperation or refusal in face-to-face surveys. The focus is on the interaction between the householder and the interviewer on the doorstep, including initial reactions from the householder, and interviewer characteristics, behaviors, and skills. In contrast to most previous research on interviewer effects, which analyzed final response behavior, the focus here is on the analysis of the process that leads to cooperation or refusal. Multilevel multinomial discrete-time event history modeling is used to examine jointly the different outcomes at each call, taking account of the influence of interviewer characteristics, call histories, and sample member characteristics. The study benefits from a rich data set comprising call record data (paradata) from several face-to-face surveys linked to interviewer observations, detailed interviewer information, and census records. The models have implications for survey practice and may be used in responsive survey designs to inform effective interviewer calling strategies

Focus (optics) · Interview · Machine learning · Multilevel model · Process (computing) · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Health disparities and outcomes · Healthcare Policy and Management · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Refusal Risk Due to Interviewers’ Characteristics and Dealing with Racism in Metropolitan Areas

    Chiara Giordano, Dirk Jacobs•Refusal Risk Due to Interviewers’…•2024

  • Using GPS-Paradata to Control the Data Collection Process

    Open Access•Daniil Lebedev•Sociological Journal•2022

  • Investigating call record data using sequence analysis to inform adaptive survey designs

    Open Access•Gabriele B Durrant, Olga Maslovskaya et al.•International Journal of Social…•2018

  • Assessment of Multiple Membership Multilevel Models

    Open Access•Gabriele B Durrant, Rebecca Vassallo et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2018

  • Are National Family Surveys Biased toward the Happy Family? A Multiactor Analysis of Selective Survey Nonresponse

    Open Access•M Kalmijn•Sociological Methods & Research•2023

  • The effect of sociodemographic (mis)match between interviewers and respondents on unit and item nonresponse in Belgium

    Open Access•Anina Vercruyssen, Celine Wuyts et al.•Social Science Research•2017

  • Interviewer Effects on Cooperation during Initial and Refusal Conversion Fieldwork Phases in Telephone Panel Surveys

    Open Access•Oliver Lipps•CAM•2019

  • Interpersonal Perceptions and Interviewer Effects in Face-to-Face Surveys

    Open Access•Simon Kühne•Sociological Methods & Research•2023

  • Responsive Design for Household Surveys

    Open Access•Robert M Groves, Steven G Heeringa•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•2006

  • Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys

    Open Access•Robert M Groves, Mick P Couper•Nonresponse in household…•1998

  • The Effects of Incentives, Interview Length, and Interviewer Characteristics on Response Rates in a Cati-Study

    Kristine M Hansen•International Journal of Public…•2006

  • The determinants of the duration of contraceptive use in China

    Open Access•Fiona Steele, Ian Diamond et al.•Demography•1996

  • Consequences of family disruption on children’s educational outcomes in Norway

    Open Access•Fiona Steele, Wendy Sigle et al.•Demography•2009

  • The Effects of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Response Behavior in Panel Surveys

    Open Access•JAN PICKERY, Geert Loosveldt et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2001

  • Fear of Crime in the United States

    Frank Clemente, Michael B Kleiman•Social Forces•1977

  • Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research

    Open Access•Yehuda Baruch, Brooks C Holtom•Human Relations•2008

  • Optimal Times to Contact Sample Households

    Michael F Weeks, Ben Jone et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1980

  • Understanding The Decision to Participate in a Survey

    Robert M Groves, Robert B Cialdini et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1992

  • Effects of Interviewer Attitudes and Behaviors on Refusal in Household Surveys

    Gabriele B Durrant, Robert M Groves et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • Evaluating the Measurement Error of Interviewer Observed Paradata

    Jennifer Sinibaldi, Gabriele B Durrant et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2013

Citations per year0.89
Citation span2017 - 2024 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae