Does political efficacy reduce self-censorship? A quantitative analysis of perceived ideological diversity and fear of isolation in Thailand’s digital sphere
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23311528 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peerawat Tan-intaraarj (0009-0001-2572-0579, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-14 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Information Technology & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1933-169X • E-ISSN: 1933-1681 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19331681.2026.2706786 |
| OpenAlex | W7170186675 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
Political efficacy is typically associated with greater political participation and a higher willingness to express opinions in public discourse. However, in politically sensitive or polarized environments, individuals may strategically withhold their views despite feeling politically capable. Drawing on the Spiral of Silence framework, this study examines how perceived ideological diversity, fear of isolation, and political efficacy influence individuals’ willingness to self-censor in online political discussions. Using survey data from 400 social media users in Thailand, regression analyses test the proposed relationships. The findings show that perceived ideological diversity significantly increases fear of isolation, which strongly predicts the willingness to self-censor. While perceived ideological diversity does not directly influence self-censorship, fear of isolation emerges as the primary psychological driver of silence. Interestingly, political efficacy is positively associated with self-censorship, suggesting that efficacious individuals utilize “Strategic Silence” to navigate social risks and preserve harmony. Furthermore, political efficacy does not moderate these effects, indicating a “ceiling effect” of social pressure in polarized contexts. These findings highlight the complex dynamics of political expression in polarized digital environments and suggest that, in certain contexts, silence functions as a strategic response rather than political disengagement.
Diversity (politics) · Feeling · Ideology · Isolation (microbiology) · Political efficacy · Politics · Public opinion · Silence · Survey data collection · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics
Stimulating the Quasi-statistical Organ
Twenty Years of Digital Media Effects on Civic and Political Participation
Under Surveillance
The “Spiral of Silence” Revisited
Extending the Spiral of Silence
The role of political fit and self-censorship at work for job satisfaction, social belonging, burnout, and turnover intentions
Why Am I Getting This Ad? How the Degree of Targeting Disclosures and Political Fit Affect Persuasion Knowledge, Party Evaluation, and Online Privacy Behaviors
Exploring the Forms of Self-Censorship
The Spiral of Silence a Theory of Public Opinion
Selective Exposure and New Political Cleavages
Computer-mediated political expression
Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election
Assessing Causality in the Relationship Between Community Attachment and Local News Media Use
Pathways to environmental activism in four countries
Too scared to share? Fear of social sanctions for political expression on social media
The Spiral of Silence and the Internet
Willingness to Self-Censor
Validating the Willingness to Self-Censor Scale
The Functional and Semantic Category of Appeal as a Linguistic Tool in Political Propaganda Texts (in the Example of the English Language)
The Influence of Political Fit, Issue Fit, and Targeted Political Advertising Disclosures on Persuasion Knowledge, Party Evaluation, and Chilling Effects
Social Media As An Online Public Sphere
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
Nonparticipation as Self-Censorship
Personal or Impersonal Evaluations? Political Sophistication and Citizen Conceptions of the Democratic Process
Standby citizens
Targeted Issue Messages and Voting Behavior
Societal Majority, Facebook, and the Spiral of Silence in the 2016 US Presidential Election
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |