Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Reframing Africa’s Image

Positive Information Outperforms Stereotype Negation in Changing Explicit Negative Evaluations

Datos Bibliográficos

ID23311565
AutoresAshley Hahn (0000-0002-2232-4976, University of Bath), Thomas Moran (0000-0002-4681-0725, Open University of Israel), Ilerioluwa Akinnola (University of Florida), Iniobong Essien (0000-0003-0277-7908, Leuphana University of Lüneburg), Marleen Stelter (0000-0001-6546-0946, FernUniversität in Hagen), Faith Adeyemi (University of Bath), Colin Tucker Smith (0000-0002-8132-9988, University of Florida)
Año2026
Fecha de publicación2026-07-21
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocial Psychological and Personality Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1948-5506 • E-ISSN: 1948-5514
EditorialSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/19485506261465709
OpenAlexW7169836219
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas28

People often counteract unwanted stereotypes by stating they are false, known as stereotype negation, but is this effective? The current work applies evaluative learning theories to Western portrayals of Africa, which are dominated by negative stereotypes around poverty, backwardness, and harsh nature. In four preregistered experiments, U.S. participants read statements about Africa that were framed either as positive facts (PFs) or as negated negative stereotypes (NNSs). Compared to controls, PFs reliably reduced preferences for Europe over Africa in general evaluations (Studies 1–4) and behavioral intentions (Studies 3–4). NNSs also reduced preferences but inconsistently and less strongly. Process analyses showed that PF-NNS differences were driven by lower perceived positivity of NNSs than PFs (Studies 2–4) and that NNSs showed lower relationships with preferences than PFs (Studies 1–3), suggesting that negations may be processed less deeply. These studies demonstrate that reframing through positive information is more effective than negating negative stereotypes.

Attribution · Cognitive reframing · Negation · Negative information · Social cognition · Stereotype (UML) · Stereotype threat · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Cultural Differences and Values · Social and Intergroup Psychology

  • G*Power 3

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • The Bidirectional Causal Relation Between Implicit Stereotypes and Implicit Prejudice

    Open Access•Curtis E Phills, Ashley Hahn et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2020

  • The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes

    Richard E Petty, Pablo Briñol et al.•Social Cognition•2007

  • An Individual Difference Measure of Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions

    Open Access•Bridget C Dunton, Russell H Fazio•Personality and Social Psychology…•1997

  • Associative and propositional processes in evaluation

    Bertram Gawronski, Galen V Bodenhausen•Psychological Bulletin•2006

  • Implicit measures

    Jan De Houwer, Sarah Teige-Mocigemba et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2009

  • Just say no! (and mean it)

    Open Access•India R Johnson, Brandon Kopp et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2016

  • Not good” is “bad,” but “not bad” is not “good”

    Herbert L Colston•Discourse Processes•1999

  • How do explicit and implicit evaluations shift? A preregistered meta-analysis of the effects of co-occurrence and relational information

    Benedek Kurdi, Kirsten N Morehouse et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2023

  • At the boundaries of automaticity

    Roland Deutsch, Bertram Gawronski et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2006

  • Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias

    David M Amodio, Patricia G Devine•Journal of Personality and Social…•2006

  • A matter of flexibility

    Kevin Winter, Annika Scholl et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2020

  • When “Just Say No” is not enough

    Open Access•Bertram Gawronski, Roland Deutsch et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2006

  • I am not guilty” vs “I am innocent”

    Open Access•Ruth Mayo, Yaacov Schul et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003

  • Belief Echoes

    Esther Thorson, Emily Thorson•Political Communication•2016

  • You can't not believe everything you read

    Daniel T Gilbert, Romin W Tafarodi et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • The negation bias

    Camiel J Beukeboom, Catrin Finkenauer et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010

  • Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition

    Anthony G Greenwald, Debbie E Mcghee et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  • A metacognitive approach to "implicit" and "explicit" evaluations

    Richard E Petty, Pablo Briñol•Psychological Bulletin•2006

  • The Insta-Gaze

    Hilary Hungerford, Angela G Subulwa et al.•Social & Cultural Geography•2023

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae