Criminal Legal Status and Health
Examining the Case of Community Supervision among Latina Women in the United States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23312147 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carmen Gutierrez (0000-0001-9256-4468, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author), Meredith Van Natta (0000-0001-9749-7815, University of California, Merced) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociology of Race and Ethnicity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2332-6492 • E-ISSN: 2332-6506 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/23326492261465025 |
| OpenAlex | W7170968152 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
Latina women are increasingly subject to community supervision through probation and parole, and they face distinct exposures to overlapping systems of surveillance. Yet few population-based studies have examined the health of Latina women under community supervision, despite a large body of research focused on the health consequences of criminal legal contact. Drawing on data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), this study examines whether and how supervised Latina women differ from their nonsupervised counterparts in health outcomes—and the extent to which these patterns compare to those observed among White and Black women. Findings show that supervised Latina women are more socioeconomically disadvantaged and more likely to be custodial parents than their nonsupervised peers, yet they exhibit broadly similar health profiles. These comparatively small differences—especially relative to larger gaps observed among White and Black women—may reflect a range of underlying processes, including shared structural conditions or unmeasured forms of institutional contact, but should not be interpreted causally. Rather than treating this absence of disparities as evidence that community supervision has no health consequences for Latina women, we interpret these patterns as consistent with processes of selection into supervision and broader structural disadvantage that shape the health of both supervised and nonsupervised Latina populations. More broadly, these findings underscore the importance of examining both differences and similarities in health outcomes across criminal legal statuses, and of situating community supervision within a wider set of social and institutional exposures that may influence population health.
Criminal justice · Disadvantage · Disadvantaged · Health equity · Population · Population health · Public health · Set (abstract data type) · White (mutation) · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Fertile Matters
Caught Up
Protect, Serve, and Deport
Mass incarceration, public health, and widening inequality in the USA
Restrictive Immigration Law and Birth Outcomes of Immigrant Women
Beyond “pains” and “gains”
Chicana Lives and Criminal Justice
Racial disparities in health conditions among prisoners compared with the general population
Beyond welfare reform
Mass Probation from Micro to Macro
Making Immigrants into Criminals
The child welfare system as a social determinant of health
Mass probation
Carceral Citizenship
Cumulative Experiences of Immigration Enforcement Policy and the Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Asian and Latinx Immigrants in the United States
Health Status and Health Care Utilization of US Adults Under Probation
I don’t want them investigating shit and taking my kids”
U.S. Latino Arrest
Mass Imprisonment and the Life Course
In and Out of Crisis
Deciding to Discipline
Situational Trust
Extended punishment
Intersectional Criminalization
Incarceration and Health
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |