Discretionary Methodological Decisions in Applied Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2331332 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard A Berk (0000-0002-2983-1276, University of California, Santa Barbara, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 317-334 |
| Publication date | 1977-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociological Methods & Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0049-1241 • E-ISSN: 1552-8294 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/004912417700500303 |
| OpenAlex | W2046977258 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 7 |
The process of completing any piece of empirical research requires that a large number of methodological decisions be made at each step in the undertaking. Some of these decisions are very clearly prescribed by conventional practice, while others allow for wide discretion. This paper discusses various kinds of discretionary decisions in applied research where special difficulties are necessarily produced by the requirement to speak to the needs of policy makers and other research users. Emphasizing the inevitable advocacy role of applied researchers, suggestions are provided for which kinds of discretionary methodological decisions in applied research should be encouraged and which should be condemned
Discretion · Economics · Empirical research · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Management science · Political science · Process (computing) · Public relations · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,15 |
| Citation span | 1979 - 2026 (48) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |