Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework

Clarifications and resources

Bibliographic Data

ID23333362
AuthorsJodi Summers Holtrop (0000-0002-5301-4014, University of Colorado Denver, corresponding author), Paul A Estabrooks (0000-0003-2261-9886, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Bridget Gaglio (0000-0003-1020-3066, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute), Samantha M Harden (0000-0003-3520-2457, Virginia Tech), Rodger Kessler (0000-0002-1729-4442, Arizona State University), Rodger S Kessler, Diane K King (0000-0002-2778-8761, University of Alaska Anchorage), Bethany M Kwan (0000-0002-4013-5618, University of Colorado Denver), Marcia G Ory (0000-0001-8036-2383, Texas A&M University), Borsika A Rabin (0000-0001-9837-7866, University of California San Diego), Rachel C Shelton (0000-0001-6496-6339, Columbia University), Russell E Glasgow (0000-0003-4218-3231, University of Colorado Denver)
Year2021
Volume5
Issue1
Pagese126-e126
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Clinical and Translational Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-8661 • E-ISSN: 2059-8661
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/cts.2021.789
PMID34367671
OpenAlexW3160151958
LanguageEN
Citations received59
References cited48

Introduction: Understanding, categorizing, and using implementation science theories, models, and frameworks is a complex undertaking. The issues involved are even more challenging given the large number of frameworks and that some of them evolve significantly over time. As a consequence, researchers and practitioners may be unintentionally mischaracterizing frameworks or basing actions and conclusions on outdated versions of a framework. Methods: This paper addresses how the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework has been described, summarizes how the model has evolved over time, and identifies and corrects several misconceptions. Results: We address 13 specific areas where misconceptions have been noted concerning the use of RE-AIM and summarize current guidance on these issues. We also discuss key changes to RE-AIM over the past 20 years, including the evolution to Pragmatic Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model, and provide resources for potential users to guide application of the framework. Conclusions: RE-AIM and many other theories and frameworks have evolved, been misunderstood, and sometimes been misapplied. To some degree, this is inevitable, but we conclude by suggesting some actions that reviewers, framework developers, and those selecting or applying frameworks can do to prevent or alleviate these problems.

Business · Computer security · Conceptual framework · Data science · Engineering ethics · Key (lock) · Management science · Process management · Risk analysis (engineering) · Social science · Sociology · Sustainability · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Ecology · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science

  • RE-AIMing for Better Maternal Health

    Open Access•Mallika Bhandarkar, Gabriela Alvarado et al.•Women s Health Issues•2026

  • Process Evaluations for the Scale-Up of Complex Interventions – a Scoping Review

    Open Access•Lekha Rathod, Martin Heine et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Does implementing strengths-based approaches improve adult social care outcomes in England? An econometric analysis of the Care Act 2014

    Open Access•Paolo Candio, Francesco Salustri•Health Policy•2026

  • Determinação de indicadores RE-AIM para avaliação da Estratégia Amamenta e Alimenta Brasil

    Open Access•Daiane Sousa Melo, Gabriela Buccini et al.•Revista de Saúde Pública•2024

  • Feasibility and acceptability of at-home play kits for middle school physical activity promotion during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•E Kroshus, Kiana Hafferty et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds

    Open Access•Laureline Guigon, Laura X Gil Sánchez et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • A process evaluation of the walking in ScHools (Wish) study using the RE-AIM framework

    Open Access•Angela Carlin, Leanne C Doherty et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • National Implementation of Perinatal Mental Health Treatment—The MumSpace Digital Stepped-Care Model

    Open Access•Jeannette Milgrom, Belinda Garner et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Developing an innovative pediatric integrated mental health care program

    Open Access•Jason Schweitzer, Anne Bird et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2023

  • Dissemination and Implementation Science Approaches for Occupational Safety and Health Research

    Open Access•Rebecca J Guerin, Samantha M Harden et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Evaluating the implementation of active transportation infrastructure during the pandemic

    Open Access•Zarah Monfaredi, Raktim Mitra et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Diabetes prevention in the Caribbean using lifestyle intervention and Metformin escalation (Lime)

    Open Access•Saria Hassan, Natasha Sobers et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Strengthening China’s National Essential Public Health Services Package for hypertension and diabetes care

    Open Access•Shangzhi Xiong, Wei Jiang et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Veterans Affairs FreshConnectProduceRx

    Open Access•Jorie M Butler, Jorie Butler et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Perceptions and Experiences With a Virtual Dental Home Teledentistry Program Among Community Health Center and Long‐Term Care Facility Staff

    Open Access•McAllister Castelaz, Tessa Heeren et al.•Journal of Public Health Dentistry•2025

  • Context-Based Development to Promote Physical Activity Among Working-Age Populations

    Open Access•Kamlai Somrak, Poramet Hemarachatanon et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Innovate! Accelerate! Evaluate! Harnessing the RE-AIM framework to examine the global dissemination of parenting resources during Covid-19 to more than 210 million people

    Open Access•J M Lachman, Nisso Nurova et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Process evaluation of a person-centred outcome measures-based quality improvement program in a hospital-based palliative care in mainland China

    Open Access•Claire E Johnson, Jinfeng Ding et al.•Quality of Life Research•2025

  • Teaching humanism and racial justice effectively in medical education with implementation of the Presence 5 for racial justice curricula

    Open Access•Madeline Rodriguez, Megha Shankar et al.•Discover Education•2026

  • Gender dynamics affecting women’s uptake of maternal health service in agrarian and pastoral settings in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Agumasie Semahegn, Gizachew Tadele Tiruneh et al.•Reproductive Health•2026

  • The VA Rural Interprofessional Faculty Development Initiative

    Open Access•Sarah Keithly, Paige Perry et al.•BMC Medical Education•2026

  • Assessing the Implementation Outcomes of a Differentiated Teleprep Delivery Model in Improving PrEP Uptake and Persistence Among Filipino Key Populations Across Four Clinics in the Philippines

    Rodenie Arnaiz Olete, Kate Leyritana et al.•AIDS Education•2026

  • Barriers underlying care gaps in Singapore’s mental health landscape and suggestions for improvement from service providers’ perspectives

    Open Access•Siang Joo Seah, Charlotte Chao Min Tan et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Community-based mortality surveillance among internally displaced vulnerable populations in Banadir region, Somalia, 2022–2023

    Open Access•Mohamed Hussein Adam, Bashiru Garba et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • A scoping review of the evidence available for the use of salons as health promotion environments, for the prevention and management of non-communicable diseases in women from different ethnic backgrounds

    Open Access•Prerana Kaneri, Marjorie Rafaela Lima do Vale et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Coming together for something good

    Open Access•Katherine A Hirchak, Oladunni Oluwoye et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Current status and progress of validation studies on the Icope scale

    Open Access•Yuan Zhao, Y Q Zhao et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Protocol for a community-engaged mixed-methods study for climate-related disaster preparedness and health care resilience in North Carolina

    Open Access•Anna Tupetz, Nidhi Saripalli et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Developing a dissemination and implementation research agenda for aging and public health

    Open Access•Paul A Estabrooks, Russell E Glasgow•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • The implementation of a “safety officer” program

    Open Access•Solomon Abebe Woldeamanuel, Linda Thumba et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Grand challenge

    Open Access•C Browning, Marcia Ory et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Evaluating the implementation of a community engaged telehealth based intervention to improve health equity for the unhoused

    Open Access•Emily Johnson, Sarah Tucker Marrison et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Evaluation planning for the timed and targeted care for families program in Eastern Visayas, Philippines

    Open Access•Yunhee Kang, Sherlyn Mae P Provido et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Implementation of an ultrasound-guided nerve block program in an academic emergency department

    Open Access•Joseph Brown, Ryan Tucker et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • How to measure the effectiveness of recovery community centers

    Open Access•Bettina B Hoeppner, Alivia C Williamson et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Identifying recruitment strategies to improve the reach of evidence-based health promotion, disease prevention, and disease self-management interventions

    Open Access•Paul A Estabrooks, Mickey L Bolyard et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • A community-embedded approach to increasing the health literacy of Aboriginal children in a regional area

    Open Access•Phillip Good, Rebekah Grace et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • A pragmatic parallel cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of optimized electronic monitors in improving tuberculosis patients’ treatment adherence in China

    Open Access•Liming Yang, Min Su•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Remote follow-up for pediatric epilepsy

    Open Access•Tiantian Zhong, Jiao Lei•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Evaluating the Application of the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework

    Open Access•Danielle D'Lima, Tayana Soukup et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Implementation effectiveness, barriers, and real-world outcomes of neuromuscular training programs for ACL injury prevention in female athletes

    Open Access•Yongzhe Gao, Lu Qi et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Implementation outcomes of tuberculosis digital adherence technologies

    Open Access•Chimweta I Chilala, Nicola Foster et al.•BMJ Global Health•2025

  • Understanding benefits of a college student-homebound adult partnership program to support aging in place

    Open Access•Allison Karpyn, Nicole Kennedy et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2024

  • Navigating patterns of oral PrEP use

    Open Access•Emerich Daroya, Alex Wells et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2024

  • Interventions that enhance nurturing care during early childhood development

    Open Access•Charlene Erasmus, Charlene J Erasmus et al.•Journal of Early Childhood Research•2025

  • Challenges and strategies for implementers and evaluators working in conflict settings

    Open Access•Laura Bond, Elizabeth K Klein et al.•Evaluation•2023

  • Indoor environment sensor systems for healthier homes

    Open Access•Tim Walker, Sarah Buckingham et al.•Housing and Society•2024

  • Comparing implementation strategies for training and supervising nonspecialists in Group Problem Management Plus

    Open Access•M Claire Greene, Diany Castellar et al.•Cambridge Prisms Global Mental…•2024

  • Strategies to improve the implementation and effectiveness of community-based psychosocial support interventions for displaced, migrant and host community women in Latin America

    Open Access•M Claire Greene, Gabrielle Wimer et al.•Cambridge Prisms Global Mental…•2024

  • Evaluation of a peer support group programme for vulnerable host population and refugees living with diabetes and/or hypertension in Lebanon

    Open Access•Leah Anku Sanga, Carla Njeim et al.•Conflict and Health•2025

  • I drink tap water as it is convenient and quick” – a mixed methods evaluation of water only school policies in London

    Open Access•Huda Yusuf, Ali Golkari et al.•Critical Public Health•2025

  • Prescriptions for Connection —Social Prescribing for Older People in Australia

    Open Access•Heather Block, Candice Oster et al.•Health Expectations•2026

  • Evaluating Fidelity Frameworks in Health Interventions

    Open Access•Evangelia Zacharia, Konstantinos D Tambalis et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2026

  • HIV provider perspectives on opioid use disorder care integration into outpatient HIV care in Baltimore, Maryland

    Sharon M Kelly, Annice Brown et al.•AIDS Care•2025

  • Specialty Crop Impacts on the Environment and Health in the U.S. Midwest

    Open Access•Whitney Fung Uy, Laura E Balis et al.•Ecology of Food and Nutrition•2026

  • Implementing an evidence‐based digital resilience intervention in residential youth care

    Open Access•Christina Stadler, David Bürgin et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2026

  • Idealizing Information Systems for the Brazilian Unified Health System

    Open Access•Thaís Fávero Alves, Francis Solange Vieira Tourinho et al.•SAGE Open•2023

  • It makes all the sense in the world”

    Open Access•Annice Brown, Sharon M Kelly et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2025

  • The Price of Practice Change

    Open Access•Valerie E R Lehman, Joanna E Siegel et al.•Medical Care•2023

  • The Science of Evaluation

    Ray Pawson•The Science of Evaluation•2013

  • Organizing Care for Patients with Chronic Illness

    Edward H Wagner, Brian T Austin et al.•Milbank Quarterly•1996

  • Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

    Open Access•Phoebe Nilsen, Per Nilsen•Implementation Science•2015

  • A Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) for Integrating Research Findings into Practice

    Open Access•Adrianne C Feldstein, Russell E Glasgow•The Joint Commission Journal on…•2008

  • The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care

    Open Access•Rachel C Shelton, Brittany Rhoades Cooper et al.•Annual Review of Public Health•2018

  • RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework

    Open Access•Russell E Glasgow, Samantha M Harden et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2019

  • Bridging Research and Practice

    Open Access•Rachel G Tabak, Rachel Tabak et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2012

  • The dynamic sustainability framework

    Open Access•David Chambers, David A Chambers et al.•Implementation Science•2013

  • Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework

    Open Access•Jodi Summers Holtrop, Borsika A Rabin et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2018

  • Disseminating Innovations in Health Care

    Donald M Berwick•JAMA•2003

  • An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs

    Open Access•Kenneth R McLeroy, Daniel L Bibeau et al.•Health Education Quarterly•1988

  • Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Making Implementation Science More Rapid

    Open Access•Russell E Glasgow, Catherine Battaglia et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • Planning for Implementation Success Using RE-AIM and CFIR Frameworks

    Open Access•Diane K King, Jo Ann Shoup et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability

    Open Access•Rachel C Shelton, David Chambers et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • National Working Group on the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework

    Open Access•Samantha M Harden, Thomas Edward Strayer et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate physical activity public health programs in México

    Open Access•Edtna Jauregui, Ann Pacheco et al.•BMC Public Health•2015

  • Participatory development and pilot testing of iChoose

    Open Access•Jennie L Hill, Jamie M Zoellner et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Operationalizing the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the collective impact of autonomous community programs that promote health and well-being

    Open Access•Robert B Shaw, Shane N Sweet et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • The RE-AIM Framework

    Bridget Gaglio, Jo Ann Shoup et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2013

  • Analysis of Novel Care Management Programs in Primary Care

    Open Access•Jodi Summers Holtrop, Georges Potworowski et al.•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2016

  • Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions

    Russell E Glasgow, Thomas Vogt et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1999

  • Long-Term Results of a Smoking Reduction Program

    Russell E Glasgow, Bridget Gaglio et al.•Medical Care•2009

Unique citing works59
Citations per year11,8
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 55

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae