Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Trust in Risk Regulation

Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food?

Bibliographic Data

ID23337366
AuthorsW Poortinga (0000-0002-6926-8545, University of East Anglia, corresponding author), Nick Pidgeon (University of East Anglia), Nick F Pidgeon (0000-0002-8991-0398)
Year2005
Volume25
Issue1
Pages199-209
Publication date2005-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRisk Analysis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0272-4332 • E-ISSN: 1539-6924
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x
PMID15787769
OpenAlexW2088479321
LanguageEN
Citations received110
References cited48

Although there is ample empirical evidence that trust in risk regulation is strongly related to the perception and acceptability of risk, it is less clear what the direction of this relationship is. This article explores the nature of the relationship, using three separate data sets on perceptions of genetically modified (GM) food among the British public. The article has two discrete but closely interrelated objectives. First, it compares two models of trust. More specifically, it investigates whether trust is the cause (causal chain account) or the consequence (associationist view) of the acceptability of GM food. Second, this study explores whether the affect heuristic can be applied to a wider number of risk‐relevant concepts than just perceived risk and benefit. The results suggest that, rather than a determinant, trust is an expression or indicator of the acceptability of GM food. In addition, and as predicted, “affect” accounts for a large portion of the variance between perceived risk, perceived benefit, trust in risk regulation, and acceptability. Overall, the results support the associationist view that specific risk judgments are driven by more general evaluative judgments The implications of these results for risk communication and policy are discussed.

Biology · Business · Computer security · Environmental health · Food safety · Risk analysis (engineering) · Computer Science · Food Science · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Medicine · Risk Perception and Management

  • Food safety and regulatory change since the ‘mad cow’ in Japan

    T Walravens•Contemporary Japan•2016

  • Everyday behaviour and everyday risk

    A R H Fischer, Peter De Vries et al.•Health Risk & Society•2008

  • Antecedent factors of the need for information regarding petrochemical complex hazards

    Vicent Tortosa-Edo, Miguel Ángel López Navarro et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2014

  • Trust and the risk of consuming polluted water in Shanghai, China

    Nahui Zhen, Jon Barnett et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2017

  • El papel de la información en las cogniciones y percepciones hacia nuevas tecnologías aplicadas a los alimentos

    Open Access•Elena Espeitx Bernat, Luis Cantarero Abad et al.•Política y Sociedad•2014

  • Farmers, Animal Disease Reporting and The Effect of Trust

    Open Access•Sarah Palmer, Max Sully et al.•Rural Society•2009

  • Culture and Technological Innovation

    Hans P Peters, John T Lang et al.•International Journal of Public…•2007

  • Kosher in New York City, halal in Aquitaine

    Open Access•Hugh Campbell, Anne Murcott et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2010

  • Bridging the social license gap

    Open Access•Jordana Composto, Jordana W Composto et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • Risk and the Public Acceptance of New Technologies

    Open Access•Rob Flynn, Paul Bellaby•Risk and the Public Acceptance of…•2007

  • Current Directions in Risk Research

    Open Access•Peter Taylor-Gooby, Peter Taylor‐gooby et al.•Risk Analysis•2006

  • Trust, the Asymmetry Principle, and the Role of Prior Beliefs

    Open Access•W Poortinga, Nick Pidgeon et al.•Risk Analysis•2004

  • The Role of Trust in the Affective Evaluation of Novel Risks

    Open Access•Cees J H Midden, Nicole Huijts et al.•Risk Analysis•2009

  • Trust and Risk Perception

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist•Risk Analysis•2021

  • Trust in Risk Management

    Open Access•Timothy C Earle•Risk Analysis•2010

  • The effects of trust in government on earthquake survivors’ risk perception and preparedness in China

    Open Access•Ziqiang Han, Xiaoli Lu et al.•Natural Hazards•2017

  • Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives

    Goda Perlaviciute, Linda Steg•Renewable and Sustainable Energy…•2014

  • Defining Moments in Risk Communication Research

    Katherine A Mccomas•Journal of Health Communication•2006

  • How environmental values influence trust and beliefs about societal oversight and need for regulation of the Australian cattle industry

    Open Access•Bradd Witt, Glenn Althor et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Is Reliance on the Affect Heuristic Associated With Age

    Open Access•Julia Nolte, Corinna E Löckenhoff et al.•The Journals of Gerontology…•2021

  • The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies

    Andrew A Anderson, Ashley A Anderson et al.•International Journal of Public…•2011

  • Searching for New Directions for Energy Policy

    Open Access•Byoung Joon Kim, Seoyong Kim et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Does Information Pattern Affect Risk Perception of Food Safety? A National Survey in China

    Open Access•Guanghua Han, Yihong Liu•International Journal of…•2018

  • Does Food Safety Risk Perception Affect the Public’s Trust in Their Government? An Empirical Study on a National Survey in China

    Open Access•Guanghua Han, Simin Yan et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Trust in Science, Perceived Media Exaggeration About Covid-19, and Social Distancing Behavior

    Open Access•Ariadne Neureiter, Marlis Stubenvoll et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2021

  • Consumers' knowledge, attitude, and behavior towards antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in food production in China

    Open Access•Qianyun Ding, Jiuzhi Gao et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Explaining Chinese Reactions to Covid-19 During the Outbreak

    Open Access•Meng Yuan•Frontiers in Public Health•2021

  • Understanding Covid-19 booster information seeking in a collectivist context

    Open Access•Xiaoshan Li, Xiaoshan Austin Li et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • The more actions, the higher the performance evaluation? Evidence from the crisis management of Covid-19 in China

    Open Access•Qi Bian, Xiaojun Zhang et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2021

  • Trust in science and solution aversion

    Open Access•Federica Spaccatini, Juliette Richetin et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2022

  • Encourage or impede? The relationship between trust in government and coproduction

    Bingsheng Liu, Sen Lin et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • The predictors of Covid-19 anxiety and helping behaviour during the pandemic

    Open Access•Özge Ünal, Merve Cesur‐Atintaş et al.•Current Psychology•2022

  • Between the Facts and a Hard Place

    Ivanka Pjesivac, Scott Eldredge et al.•Health Communication•2024

  • Exposure to online news about air pollution and public trust in regulators in China

    Qing Huang•Asian Journal of Communication•2021

  • Social dimensions of synthetic biology in the agrifood sector

    Open Access•Shan Jin, Beth Clark et al.•British Food Journal•2021

  • Toward acceptance of future foods

    Open Access•Toritseju Begho, Kehinde Odeniyi et al.•British Food Journal•2023

  • The interpersonal semantics of rhetoric

    Open Access•Wenge Chen, Ranran Zhang•Pragmatics and Society•2024

  • Positive Affective Framing of Information Reduces Risk Perceptions and Increases Acceptance of Recycled Water

    Tameika Greenaway, Kelly S Fielding•Environmental Communication•2020

  • Energy policy and research

    Open Access•Michael R Greenberg•Energy Research & Social Science•2014

  • Effects of trust and public participation on acceptability of renewable energy projects in the Netherlands and China

    Open Access•Lu Liu, Thijs Bouman et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • The more public influence, the better? The effects of full versus shared influence on public acceptability of energy projects in the Netherlands and China

    Open Access•Lu Liu, Thijs Bouman et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Urgency in energy justice

    Open Access•Tristan Partridge, Merryn Thomas et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Trust in institutions and public acceptability of risky energy production

    Open Access•Gonzalo Palomo-Vélez, Nadja Contzen et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • The National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard of 2016

    Open Access•Brianne Suldovsky, William K Hallman•Societies•2022

  • Responsibilization in contemporary Swedish crisis management

    Open Access•Carl Rådestad, Oscar Larsson•Critical Policy Studies•2018

  • Developments in the Debate on Nanoethics

    Open Access•Arianna Ferrari•NanoEthics•2010

  • Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act

    Open Access•Johann Laux, Sandra Wachter et al.•Regulation & Governance•2023

  • Revisiting the Transatlantic Divergence over GMOs

    Hannes R Stephan•Global Environmental Politics•2012

  • Public opinion and biotechnological innovation

    Open Access•Steven Weldon, David Laycock•Policy and Society•2009

  • Biotechnologies in agriculture and forestry

    Open Access•Ricardo Pelai, Shannon M Hagerman et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • Citizen views about public meetings

    John C Besley, Katherine A Mccomas et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2011

  • Trust and affect

    Jennifer R Allen Catellier, Z Janet Yang et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2012

  • Social Divisions of Trust

    Peter Taylor-Gooby, Peter Taylor‐gooby•Journal of Risk Research•2006

  • People’s responses to risks of electromagnetic fields and trust in government policy

    Diana van Dongen, Liesbeth Claassen et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2013

  • Consumer responses to plant viruses in the context of an emerging agri-food risk

    Open Access•Shan Jin, Guangpu Yang et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2024

  • The role of negative associations and trust in risk perception of new hydrogen systems

    Fiona N H Montijn‐Dorgelo, Cees J H Midden•Journal of Risk Research•2008

  • Optimism and the perceptions of new risks

    Joan Costa-Font, Elias Mossialos et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2009

  • Cross‐National Comparisons of Image Associations with “Global Warming” and “Climate Change” Among Laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain1

    Irene Lorenzoni, Anthony Leiserowitz et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2006

  • The ethics of technological risk

    Tessa Fox, Marjolein B A van Asselt•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • Public meetings about local cancer clusters

    Katherine A Mccomas, Helen Lundell et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • How can we Make Food Risk Communication Better

    Ragnar E Lofstedt•Journal of Risk Research•2006

  • The siting of a research centre on clean coal combustion and CO 2 capture in Spain

    Ana Prades, Josep Espluga Trenc et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2009

  • How trust in government relates to public attitudes toward shale gas development in China

    Yu Zhang, Ashley Clark et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2023

  • From a fiasco to the Supertanker grand finale

    Anat Gesser‐Edelsburg, Mina Zemach•Journal of Risk Research•2012

  • Public engagement to build trust

    Judith Petts•Journal of Risk Research•2008

  • Public trust in institutions and information sources regarding risk management and communication

    George Chryssochoidis, Anna Strada et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2009

  • A Tale of Two Food Risks

    William Lei, William Leiss et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2006

  • Drivers of Chinese public attitudes towards agri-food applications based on synthetic biology

    Open Access•Shan Jin, Beth Clark et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2024

  • The antecedent role of personal environmental values in the relationships among trust in companies, information processing and risk perception

    Vicent Tortosa-Edo, Miguel Ángel López Navarro et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2013

  • Precautionary advice about mobile phones

    Julie Barnett, Lada Timotijevic et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2008

  • Trust, acceptance and knowledge of technological and environmental hazards in Chile

    Nicolás C Bronfman, Esperanza López Vázquez et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2008

  • Did public risk perspectives of mad cow disease reflect media representations and actual outcomes

    Amanda D Boyd, Cynthia G Jardine•Journal of Risk Research•2011

  • Investigating the operation of the affect heuristic

    Ellen Townsend, Alexa Spence et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2013

  • Commonplaces and social uncertainty

    Inger Lassen•Journal of Risk Research•2008

  • Evaluating Public Responses to Environmental Trend Indicators

    Open Access•Branden B Johnson, Caron Chess•Science Communication•2006

  • Attribute-Priming Effects on Presidential Approval

    Yue Tan, Ping Shaw•Issues & Studies•2018

  • Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain

    Open Access•Nick Pidgeon, Nick F Pidgeon et al.•Global Environmental Change•2007

  • Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change

    Open Access•Lorraine Whitmarsh•Global Environmental Change•2011

  • Understanding Public Calls for Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods

    Shauna Nep, Kieran C O''Doherty•Society & Natural Resources•2012

  • Ways of thinking about the incinerator

    Open Access•Nicoletta Cavazza, Sandro Rubichi•The Social Science Journal•2013

  • Print news coverage of the 2010 Iowa egg recall

    Open Access•Linnea Laestadius, Linnea I Laestadius et al.•Food Policy•2012

  • Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate

    Open Access•Karen Bickerstaff, Irene Lorenzoni et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2008

  • Bias in the exchange of arguments

    Open Access•Eefje Cuppen, Matthijs Hisschemöller et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2009

  • ‘It is not entirely healthy.’ A qualitative study into public appraisals of uncertain risks of chemical substances in food

    Open Access•Tom Jansen, Liesbeth Claassen et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  • Human-centric AI governance

    Open Access•Valentin Wittmann, Timo Meynhardt•Government Information Quarterly•2025

  • Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk

    Open Access•Teun Terpstra•Risk Analysis•2011

  • The Effect of Trust on West Australian Farmers' Responses to Infectious Livestock Diseases

    Open Access•Sarah Palmer, Farida Fozdar et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2009

  • Confianza, incertidumbre y percepción social de las tecnologías avanzadas. Un estudio de caso

    Open Access•Rosario Solá, Ana Prades et al.•Revista Internacional de Sociología•2009

  • The Effects of Media Coverage of Scientific Retractions on Risk Perceptions

    Open Access•Dilshani Sarathchandra, Aaron M Mccright•SAGE Open•2017

  • Trust—A monolithic panacea in land use planning

    Open Access•Corina HöPpner•Land Use Policy•2009

  • Whose expertise counts? Assisted migration and the politics of knowledge in British Columbia’s public forests

    Open Access•Ricardo Pelai, Shannon M Hagerman et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Which perceived characteristics make product innovations appealing to the consumer? A study on the acceptance of fruit innovations using cross-cultural consumer segmentation

    Open Access•Marleen C Onwezen, Jos Bartels•Appetite•2011

  • How trust in institutions and organizations builds general consumer confidence in the safety of food

    Open Access•J de Jonge, J C M Van Trijp et al.•Appetite•2008

  • Consumer responses to communication about food risk management

    Open Access•Heleen van Dijk, Julie Houghton et al.•Appetite•2008

  • Controversial science-based technology public attitude formation and regulation in comparative perspective

    Open Access•Ching Leong, Ching Ching Leong et al.•Technology in Society•2011

  • A healthy scepticism towards water in South Australia

    Open Access•E Willis, Meryl Pearce et al.•International Journal of…•2013

  • Norsk skepsis og usikkerhet om klimaendringer

    Open Access•Marthe Hårvik Austgulen, Eivind Stø•Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning•2013

  • The Importance of Having a Different Opinion Europeans and GM foods

    Open Access•Enzo Loner•European Journal of Sociology•2008

  • Oarsmen or Guardians? Exploring the Influence of Attitudes Toward Government Interventions on Perceptions of Government's Trustworthiness

    Open Access•Song Lang, Qi Bian et al.•Journal of Contingencies and…•2026

  • Emotional Beliefs

    Open Access•Jonathan Mercer•International Organization•2010

  • Accidental News

    Harvey Molotch, Marilyn Lester•Media, Journalism and Democracy•2018

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Leon Festinger•A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance•1957

  • A Causal Model Explaining the Perception and Acceptance of Gene Technology 1

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist•Journal of Applied Social…•1999

  • Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes

    Open Access•Stephen L Crites, Leandre R Fabrigar et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•1994

  • The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality

    Open Access•Jonathan J Koehler•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1993

  • Trust, the Asymmetry Principle, and the Role of Prior Beliefs

    Open Access•W Poortinga, Nick Pidgeon et al.•Risk Analysis•2004

  • Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository

    Open Access•James Flynn, William Burns et al.•Risk Analysis•1992

  • Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings

    Open Access•Paul Slovic, Melissa L Finucane et al.•Risk Analysis•2004

  • Credibility and trust in risk communication

    Ortwin Renn, Debra Levine•Communicating Risks to the Public•1991

  • The Affect Heuristic

    Open Access•Paul Slovic, Melissa L Finucane et al.•Heuristics and biases•2002

  • Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation

    Open Access•W Poortinga, Nick Pidgeon et al.•Risk Analysis•2003

  • Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged

    Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff•Risk Analysis•1995

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Leon Festinger, Camille Morvan et al.•A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance•2017

  • Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy

    Open Access•Paul Slovic•Risk Analysis•1993

  • Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, George Cvetkovich et al.•Risk Analysis•2000

  • Trust, Perceived Risk, and Attitudes Toward Food Technologies 1

    Open Access•J Richard Eiser, Susan Miles et al.•Journal of Applied Social…•2002

  • What Determines Trust in Information About Food‐Related Risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Chaya Howard et al.•Risk Analysis•1996

  • Social Surveys

    David De Vaus, D A De Vaus•Social surveys•2002

  • A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit

    Open Access•Ali Alhakami, Ali Siddiq Alhakami et al.•Risk Analysis•1994

  • Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust

    Branden B Johnson•Journal of Risk Research•1999

  • Associations between affect and risk perception

    Torbjørn Rundmo•Journal of Risk Research•2002

  • The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits

    Open Access•Melissa L Finucane, Ali Alhakami et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2000

  • The influence of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic engineering in food production

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Chaya Howard et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•1998

  • Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks

    Open Access•Roger E Kasperson, Dominic Golding et al.•Journal of Social Issues•1992

  • Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models

    Michael E Sobel•Sociological Methodology•1982

  • The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research

    Reuben M Baron, D A Kenny•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Surveys in social research

    D A De Vaus•Surveys in social research•1996

  • Biased assimilation and attitude polarization

    Charles G Lord, Lee Ro et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • The Division of Labour in Society

    Open Access•George Simpson, Emile Durkheim et al.•Durkheim•1984

  • Feeling and thinking

    Robert B Zajonc•American Psychologist•1980

  • Risk as feelings

    G Loewenstein, George F Loewenstein et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2001

  • Public Opposition To The Siting Of The High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository

    Open Access•K David Pijawka, Alvin H Mushkatel•Review of Policy Research•1991

  • The Social Control of Impersonal Trust

    Susan P Shapiro•American Journal of Sociology•1987

  • Accidental News

    Harvey Molotch, Marilyn Lester•American Journal of Sociology•1975

Unique citing works110
Citations per year5
Citation span2004 - 2026 (23)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 101

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae