Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Surface analysis of stone and bone tools

Bibliographic Data

ID23345951
AuthorsW J Stemp (0000-0002-8063-9327, Keene State College, corresponding author), Adam S Watson (0000-0003-2356-9606), Adam Watson (0000-0002-5707-0523, American Museum of Natural History, corresponding author), Adrian Evans (0000-0001-6891-8465, University of Bradford, corresponding author), Adrian A Evans
Year2015
Volume4
Issue1
Pages013001
Publication date2015-11-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSurface Topography: Metrology and Properties (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2051-672X • E-ISSN: 2051-672X
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/2051-672x/4/1/013001
OpenAlexW2144298174
LanguageEN
Citations received60
References cited241

Microwear (use-wear) analysis is a powerful method for identifying tool use that archaeologists and anthropologists employ to determine the activities undertaken by both humans and their hominin ancestors. Knowledge of tool use allows for more accurate and detailed reconstructions of past behavior, particularly in relation to subsistence practices, economic activities, conflict and ritual. It can also be used to document changes in these activities over time, in different locations, and by different members of society, in terms of gender and status, for example. Both stone and bone tools have been analyzed using a variety of techniques that focus on the observation, documentation and interpretation of wear traces. Traditionally, microwear analysis relied on the qualitative assessment of wear features using microscopes and often included comparisons between replicated tools used experimentally and the recovered artifacts, as well as functional analogies dependent upon modern implements and those used by indigenous peoples from various places around the world. Determination of tool use has also relied on the recovery and analysis of both organic and inorganic residues of past worked materials that survived in and on artifact surfaces. To determine tool use and better understand the mechanics of wear formation, particularly on stone and bone, archaeologists and anthropologists have increasingly turned to surface metrology and tribology to assist them in their research. This paper provides a history of the development of traditional microwear analysis in archaeology and anthropology and also explores the introduction and adoption of more modern methods and technologies for documenting and identifying wear on stone and bone tools, specifically those developed for the engineering sciences to study surface structures on micro- and nanoscales. The current state of microwear analysis is discussed as are the future directions in the study of microwear on stone and bone tools.

Archaeology · Artifact (error) · Data science · Documentation · Indigenous · Interpretation (philosophy) · Paleoanthropology · Stone tool · Subsistence agriculture · Variety (cybernetics) · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Ecology · Engineering · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · History · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

  • Kárpát-medencei nyersanyagokból készült kőeszközök felületi elváltozásainak kvalitatív és kvantitatív elemzése

    Open Access•Antony Borel, Raphaël Deltombe et al.•Magyar Régészet•2021

  • A review of the curved lithic cleavers from the rainforest of southeastern South America

    Open Access•D Loponte, Mirian Carbonera et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2023

  • Lawrence H. Keeley's contributions to the use of microwear analysis in reconstructions of past human behavior (1972–2017)

    Open Access•Richard W Yerkes, Richard Yerkes•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2019

  • Pointed Objects of the Mierzanowice Culture (Early Bronze Age). A Study of Function by Use-Wear Analysis

    Open Access•Kinga Winnicka•Cuadernos de Prehistoria y…•2019

  • Quantifying 3D Micro‐Surface Changes on Experimental Stones Used to Break Bones and Their Implications for the Analysis of Early Stone Age Pounding Tools

    Open Access•Alfonso Benito-Calvo, Adrián Arroyo et al.•Archaeometry•2018

  • Stone Artifacts

    Open Access•Edward B Banning•Interdisciplinary Contributions…•2020

  • A Protocol to Identify the Wear Traces on Osseous Points Used for Fishing

    Open Access•Grzegorz Osipowicz, Justyna Orłowska et al.•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2027

  • The morphometrics and microwear of a small Clovis assemblage from Guernsey County, Southeastern Ohio, U.S.A

    Open Access•Angelia Werner, Kathleen Jones et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2017

  • Cognitive possibilities of studying pigments on stone artefacts

    Open Access•Serhii Ryzhov, Victoriia Tysliuk et al.•Vita Antiqua•2024

  • Bone and Shell Tools

    Open Access•Edward B Banning•Interdisciplinary Contributions…•2020

  • To What Extent Are Similarities in Lithic Artifacts Due to Convergence

    Open Access•Aylar Abdolahzadeh, Deborah I Olszewski et al.•Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology•2025

  • The Joshua Cache

    Open Access•M I Eren, Michelle Bebber et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2026

  • Not All That Glitters is Gold? Rock Crystal in the Early British Neolithic at Dorstone Hill, Herefordshire, and the Wider British and Irish Context

    Open Access•Nicholas Overton, Elizabeth Healey et al.•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2023

  • First evidence of hippopotamus ivory exchange networks in north-eastern Iberian Peninsula

    Open Access•Jose Miguel Morillo Leon, Àfrica Pitarch Martí et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2025

  • An Examination of Terminal Archaic Bone and Antler Implements from the Firehouse Site, Dearborn County, Indiana

    Christopher R Moore•Midcontinental Journal of…•2017

  • Early occupation of High Asia

    Open Access•А Yu Fedorchenko, William T T Taylor et al.•Quaternary International•2020

  • Replicating surface texture

    Open Access•D A Macdonald, Robert Harman et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2018

  • A new combined approach using confocal and scanning electron microscopy to image surface modifications on quartzite

    Open Access•A Pedergnana, Andreu Ollé et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2020

  • Replicative experimental use of Palaeolithic Ground Stone Tools

    Open Access•Giusi Sorrentino, Laura Longo et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2024

  • Testing imaging confocal microscopy, laser scanning confocal microscopy, and focus variation microscopy for microscale measurement of edge cross-sections and calculation of edge curvature on stone tools

    Open Access•W J Stemp, D A Macdonald et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2019

  • Multiscale characterizations of topographic measurements on lithic materials and microwear using a GelSight Max

    Open Access•Katarzyna Peta, W J Stemp et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2024

  • Exploring the microscale

    Open Access•D A Macdonald, W J Stemp et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2018

  • The role of artificial contact materials in experimental use-wear studies

    Open Access•Lisa Schunk, Walter Gneisinger et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2022

  • An experimental investigation of the effects of post-depositional damage on current quantitative use-wear methods

    Open Access•J Jeffrey Werner•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2017

  • A workflow for quality control in surface texture analysis applied to teeth and tools

    Open Access•Ivan Calandra•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2022

  • A pilot investigation into forager craft activities in the middle Limpopo Valley, southern Africa

    Open Access•Tim Forssman, Trent Seiler et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2018

  • Microscope agnosticism and the characterization of sedimentary abrasion of flint stone tools

    Open Access•Guillermo Bustos‐Pérez, Andreu Ollé•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2024

  • Making impact

    Open Access•Tim Maloney, Adhi Agus Oktaviana et al.•Archaeological Research in Asia•2022

  • Identifying Experimental Tool Use Through Confocal Microscopy

    Open Access•Juan José Ibáñez, Talía Lazuén Fernández et al.•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2018

  • Why should traceology learn from dental microwear, and vice-versa

    Open Access•Ivan Calandra, A Pedergnana et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2019

  • Analysis of Micro-Residues on Stone Tools From Zaskelna IX, Crimea

    Open Access•Serhii Ryzhov, Vadym Stepanchuk et al.•Arheologia•2022

  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Surface Alterations of Stone Tools Made of Raw Materials from the Carpathian Basin

    Open Access•Antony Borel, Raphaël Deltombe et al.•Hungarian Archaeology•2021

  • Toward Recognizing the Prehistoric Butchery of Frozen Meat

    Samantha Kirgesner, Michelle Bebber et al.•Lithic Technology•2019

  • Ghosts in the Room and Elephants in the Machine

    W J Stemp•Lithic Technology•2023

  • The lithic assemblage from the 700,000-year-old butchery site of Kalinga (Luzon Island, Philippines)

    Open Access•Justin Guibert, Jean-Baptiste Lambard et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2026

  • The Effect of Heat on Lithic Microwear Traces

    Ashley Rutkoski, Ashley R Rutkoski et al.•Lithic Technology•2019

  • A New View on the Late Pleistocene Lithic Remains from Pikimachay Cave, South Central Peru

    Open Access•Juan Yataco, Hugo Nami•Archaeological Discovery•2022

  • Stone Age technologies and human behaviors as reflected in decoration of osseous artefacts from the northern part of East-Central Europe

    Open Access•Grzegorz Osipowicz, Justyna Orłowska et al.•Quaternary International•2020

  • Was it ground? A closer look at various prehistoric bone grinding techniques – An experimental and traceological study

    Open Access•Justyna Orłowska, Mateusz Ćwiek et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2022

  • D multiscale curvature analysis of tool edges as an indicator of cereal harvesting intensity

    Open Access•D A Macdonald, Tomasz Bartkowiak et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2020

  • On the Mousterian origin of bone-tipped hunting weapons in Europe

    Open Access•L V Golovanova, Vladimir Borisovich Doronichev et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2025

  • A citation network analysis of lithic microwear research

    Open Access•Christopher J Dunmore, Ben Pateman et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2018

  • Description, Geometric Morphometrics, and Microwear of Five Clovis Fluted Projectile Points from Lucas and Wood Counties, Northwest Ohio, USA

    Open Access•Alyssa Perrone, Michelle Bebber et al.•Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology•2020

  • Barely scratched the surface

    Open Access•R Fuentes, Alfred Pawlik•Archaeological Research in Asia•2022

  • Expedient lithic technology in complex sedentary societies

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Elizabeth Graham et al.•Journal of Anthropological…•2021

  • The West Tofts handaxe

    Open Access•Emily Flanders, A Key•Journal of Archaeological Science•2023

  • Hunter-gatherer gatherings

    G Logan Miller, Michelle Bebber et al.•World Archaeology•2018

  • Here's the dirt

    Open Access•D A Macdonald, Liye Xie et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2019

  • The perception of gloss

    Open Access•Justin Bradfield•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2020

  • Technological and behavioural complexity in expedient industries

    Open Access•R Fuentes, R Ono et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2019

  • New taphonomic advances in 3D digital microscopy

    Open Access•L A Courtenay, J Yravedra et al.•Quaternary International•2018

  • Rethinking Use-Wear Analysis and Experimentation as Applied to the Study of Past Hominin Tool Use

    Open Access•João Marreiros, Ivan Calandra et al.•Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology•2020

  • Application of computed tomography to the study of Mesolithic portable art

    Open Access•Tomasz Płonka, Marcin Diakowski et al.•Archaeometry•2024

  • Topographic analysis of ceramic vessel surfaces and variability in wall thickness as a means to identify pottery-forming methods

    Open Access•Richard Thér•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2025

  • Quantification of microwear on experimental shell tools

    Open Access•D A Macdonald, Naomi L Martisius et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2025

  • Discrimination of wheel-thrown pottery surface treatment by Deep Learning

    Open Access•Josef Wilczek, Richard Thér et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2022

  • A method for the taphonomic assessment of bone tools using 3D surface texture analysis of bone microtopography

    Open Access•Naomi L Martisius, Shannon J P Mcpherron et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2020

  • Microwear study of quartzite artefacts

    Open Access•A Pedergnana, Andreu Ollé et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2018

  • Identifying the contribution of rotational movement in pottery forming based on statistical surface analysis

    Open Access•Richard Thér, Josef Wilczek•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2022

  • The Use of the Horse Phalanx by the Chiyalik Culture Population Based on the Materials of the Settlement of Yabalakly-1 (South Urals)

    Open Access•E V Ruslanov, E A Akhmetova et al.•Vestnik NSU Series History and…•2024

  • Maya stone tools

    T Hester•Maya stone tools•1991

  • The Functional Analysis of Flint Implements: Pincevent and Pont d'Ambon : two case studies from the French Final Palaeolithic

    Emily H Moss•The functional analysis of flint…•1983

  • Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools

    Open Access•Veerle Rots•Prehension and Hafting Traces on…•2010

  • Prehistoric Blood Residues

    Open Access•Thomas H Loy, Thomas Loy•Science•1983

  • Dental microwear texture analysis shows within-species diet variability in fossil hominins

    Open Access•Robert S Scott, Peter S Ungar et al.•Nature•2005

  • Using metrology in early prehistoric stone tool research

    Open Access•A A Evans, Adrian Evans et al.•Scanning•2011

  • Quantifying Microwear on Experimental Mistassini Quartzite Scrapers

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Harry J Lerner et al.•Scanning•2013

  • Experimental determination of stone tool uses

    Lawrence H Keeley•Experimental determination of…•1980

  • Starch analysis reveals prehistoric plant translocations and shell tool use, Marquesas Islands, Polynesia

    Open Access•M S Allen, Ella Ussher•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Some criticisms and suggestions in response to Newcomer et al. (1986)

    Open Access•Linda Hurcombe•Journal of Archaeological Science•1988

  • Early and mid Holocene tool-use and processing of taro (Colocasia esculenta), yam (Dioscorea sp.) and other plants at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of Papua New Guinea

    Open Access•Richard Fullagar, Judith Field et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2006

  • Tracéologie des outils tranchants en os des Ve et IVe millénaires av. J.-C. en Bassin parisien

    Y Maigrot•Bulletin de la Société…•1997

  • Use–Wear and Residue Analysis in Archeology

    Open Access•Nuno Bicho, João Marreiros et al.•Use-Wear and Residue Analysis in…•2015

  • Ancient Stone Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments, of Great Britain

    Open Access•John Evans•Ancient Stone Implements,…•2015

  • Tendances actuelles des recherches sur l'industrie de l'os

    Henriette Camps-Fabrer•Bulletin de la Société…•1975

  • Behavioural Complexity and Modern Traits in the Philippine Upper Palaeolithic

    Alfred Pawlik, Alfred F Pawlik•Asian perspectives•2012

  • Perspectives on ancient Maya bone crafting from a Classic period bone-artifact manufacturing assemblage

    Open Access•Kitty F Emery•Journal of Anthropological…•2009

  • Prehistoric Hafting and Mobility in the North American Midcontinent

    Open Access•George H Odell•Journal of Anthropological…•1994

  • Étude fonctionnelle des artefacts lithiques du site paléolithique supérieur de Hutouliang, Chine du Nord

    Open Access•Xiaoling Zhang, Xing Gao et al.•L Anthropologie•2012

  • Functional analysis of prehistoric flint tools by high-power microscopy

    Open Access•Helle Juel Jensen•Journal of World Prehistory•1988

  • Ground stone use-wear analysis

    Open Access•Jenny L Adams•Journal of Archaeological Science•2014

  • A review of “Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests”

    Open Access•Emily H Moss•Journal of Archaeological Science•1987

  • A review of quantification of lithic use-wear using laser profilometry

    Open Access•W J Stemp•Journal of Archaeological Science•2014

  • Technique and methodology in microwear studies

    Lawrence H Keeley•World Archaeology•1974

  • Is Loading a Significantly Influential Factor in the Development of Lithic Microwear? An Experimental Test Using LSCM on Basalt from Olduvai Gorge

    Open Access•A Key, Alastair J M Key et al.•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2014

  • Measuring Retouch Intensity in Lithic Tools

    Open Access•J I Morales, Carlos Lorenzo et al.•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2013

  • The Functional Riddle of 'Glossy' Canaanean Blades and the Near Eastern Threshing Sledge

    Patricia C Anderson, Jacques Chabot et al.•Journal of Mediterranean…•2007

  • The Functional Riddle of ?Glossy? Canaanean Blades and the Near Eastern Threshing Sledge

    Patricia C Anderson, Jacques Chabot et al.•Journal of Mediterranean…•2004

  • Microwear methodology

    Open Access•M H Newcomer, Mark Newcomer et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1988

  • Gloss and use-wear traces on flint sickles and similar phenomena

    Open Access•N D MEEKS, Nigel Meeks et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1982

  • Multi-scale tribological analysis of the technique of manufacture of an obsidian bracelet from Aşıklı Höyük (Aceramic Neolithic, Central Anatolia)

    Open Access•Laurence Astruc, R Vargiolu et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2011

  • A Cautionary Note on the use of Hemastix and Dot-blot Assays for the Detection and Confirmation of Archaeological Blood Residues

    Open Access•Andrew Manning, Andrew P Manning•Journal of Archaeological Science•1994

  • UBM Laser Profilometry and Lithic Use-Wear Analysis

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Michael Stemp•Journal of Archaeological Science•2001

  • Documenting Stages of Polish Development on Experimental Stone Tools

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Michael Stemp•Journal of Archaeological Science•2003

  • An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Trampling on the Results of Lithic Microwear Analysis

    Open Access•J J Shea, Joel D Klenck•Journal of Archaeological Science•1993

  • Integration of use-wear with protein residue analysis – a study of tool use and function in the south Scandinavian Early Neolithic

    Open Access•Anders Högberg, Kathryn Puseman et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2009

  • On the importance of blind testing in archaeological science

    Open Access•Adrian Evans, Adrian Anthony Evans•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Discriminating wild vs domestic cereal harvesting micropolish through laser confocal microscopy

    Open Access•Juan José Ibáñez, Jesús González‐urquijo et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • The role of abrasives in the formation of lithic use-wear

    Open Access•Jack W Brink, J Brink•Journal of Archaeological Science•1978

  • A multi-analytical methodology of lithic residue analysis applied to Paleolithic tools from Hummal, Syria

    Open Access•G Monnier, Gilliane F Monnier et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Experimental determination of use wear on stone adzes from Boomplaas Cave, South Africa

    Open Access•Johan Binneman, Janette Deacon•Journal of Archaeological Science•1986

  • Maize in ancient Ecuador

    Open Access•D M Pearsall, Karol Chandler-Ezell et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2003

  • Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests

    Open Access•D B Bamforth•Journal of Archaeological Science•1988

  • A study of the feasibility of detecting blood residue on artifacts

    Open Access•D M Gurfinkel, Debbie Gurfinkel et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1988

  • Use-wear analysis of obsidian artifacts from Later Stone Age shell midden sites on the Red Sea Coast of Eritrea, with experimental results

    Open Access•Amanuel Beyin•Journal of Archaeological Science•2010

  • Blood from Stones? Some Methodological and Interpretive Problems in Blood Residue Analysis

    Open Access•Stuart J Fiedel, Stuart Fiedel•Journal of Archaeological Science•1996

  • Functional analysis of prismatic blades and bladelets from Pinson Mounds, Tennessee

    Open Access•Marvin Kay, Robert C Mainfort•Journal of Archaeological Science•2014

  • The elemental chemistry of lithic microwear

    Open Access•Adrian Evans, Adrian A Evans et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2005

  • Clues to Stone Tool Function Re-examined

    Open Access•Huw Barton, Robin Torrence et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1998

  • Recovery of Protein and DNA Trapped in Stone Tool Microcracks

    Open Access•Orin C Shanks, Robson Bonnichsen et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2001

  • Verifying the reliability of blood residue analysis on archaeological tools

    Open Access•Brian Kooyman, Margaret E Newman et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1992

  • The formation of use-wear polish on flint

    Open Access•Romana Unger‐hamilton, Romana Unger-Hamilton•Journal of Archaeological Science•1984

  • Insights from a tribological analysis of the tribulum

    Open Access•P C Anderson, J M Georges et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2006

  • Applying SEM to the study of use-wear on unmodified shell tools

    Open Access•Laxmi Tumung, Behrouz Bazgir et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2015

  • Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests

    Open Access•Mark Newcomer, R Grace et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1986

  • Microwear analysis of early Neolithic (PPNA) axes and bifacial tools from Netiv Hagdud in the Jordan Valley, Israel

    Open Access•Richard W Yerkes, R Barkai et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2003

  • Some Preliminary Observations on Subsurface Damage on Experimental and Archaeological Quartz Tools using CLSM and Dye

    Open Access•Monika Derndarsky, Göran Ocklind•Journal of Archaeological Science•2001

  • On distinguishing natural from cultural damage on archaeological antler

    Open Access•Sandra L Olsen•Journal of Archaeological Science•1989

  • On the application of 3-D scanning technology for the documentation and typology of lithic artifacts

    Open Access•Leore Grosman, Oded Smikt et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2008

  • Ambiguous use traces and blind test results

    Open Access•D B Bamforth, George R Burns et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1990

  • The Presence of Starch Grains on Prehistoric Stone Tools from the Humid Neotropics

    Open Access•Dolores R Piperno, Irene Holst•Journal of Archaeological Science•1998

  • Science and interpretation in microwear studies

    Open Access•A L Van Gijn•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Possible bone threshing tools from the Neolithic levels of the Grotta dei Piccioni (Abruzzo, Italy)

    Open Access•Francesco D’errico, Giacomo Giacobini et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1995

  • Identification of Woodworking on Stone Tools through Residue and Use-Wear Analyses

    Open Access•Bruce L Hardy, Bruce Hardy et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1998

  • DNA from ancient stone tools and bones excavated at Bugas-Holding, Wyoming

    Open Access•Orin C Shanks, Larry D Hodges et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2004

  • Recovery of Mammalian DNA from Middle Paleolithic Stone Tools

    Open Access•Bruce L Hardy, Bruce Hardy et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1997

  • A cautionary note on the use of chemstrips for detection of blood residues on prehistoric stone tools

    Open Access•Jay F Custer, John Ilgenfritz et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1988

  • The Quantification of Use-Wear Polish Using Image Analysis. First Results

    Open Access•Jesús González‐urquijo, Jesús Emilio González-Urquijo et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2003

  • Lithic raw material physical properties and use-wear accrual

    Open Access•Harry J Lerner, Harry Lerner et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2006

  • Microwear analysis of experimental flint tools

    Open Access•Lawrence H Keeley, M H Newcomer et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1977

  • Blind tests shed light on possibilities and limitations for identifying stone tool prehension and hafting

    Open Access•Veerle Rots, Louis Pirnay et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2006

  • Scanning electron microscopy of dry hide working tools

    Open Access•María Estela Mansur, Maria Estela Mansur-Franchomme•Journal of Archaeological Science•1983

  • The application of focus variation microscopy for lithic use-wear quantification

    Open Access•D A Macdonald•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Integrating Phytoliths within Use-Wear/Residue Studies of Stone Tools

    Open Access•Lisa Kealhofer, Robin Torrence et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1999

  • Identification of archaeological blood proteins

    Open Access•ELINOR F DOWNS, Emily Downs et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1995

  • The first residue analysis blind tests

    Open Access•L Wadley, M Lombard et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2004

  • The role of silica in Polish formation

    Open Access•Richard Fullagar, Richard L K Fullagar•Journal of Archaeological Science•1991

  • An investigation of the fractal properties of flint microwear images

    Open Access•D Rees, G G Wilkinson et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1991

  • Reaping the rewards

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Adrian Evans et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2011

  • Notes on Early Sickles

    F C J Spurrell•Archaeological Journal•1892

  • Additional comments on blood residue analysis in archaeology

    Open Access•Jeff Leach, Jeff D Leach et al.•Antiquity•1995

  • Le lustre des faucilles et les autres traces d'usage des outils en silex

    J Gysels, Daniel Cahen•Bulletin de la Société…•1982

  • Les grattoirs-burins du Morin et du Roc de Marcamps (Gironde)

    Michel Lenoir•Bulletin de la Société…•1978

  • Identifying Edge Damage on Surf Ace Occurring Lithic Artifacts

    Donald R Keller•Lithic Technology•1979

  • Starting From Scratch

    Deborah Seitzer Olausson•Lithic Technology•1980

  • Edge Damage on Experimentally Used Scra Pers of Hawaiian Basalt

    Patricia Price Beggerly•Lithic Technology•1976

  • The Effects of Human Trample Damage on Lithics

    John H Pryor•Lithic Technology•1988

  • Notes on the Occurrence of Spontaneous ReTouch

    Jack W Brink, Jack Brink•Lithic Technology•1978

  • Manufacture and Use of Bone Points from Early Neolithic Colle Santo Stefano, Abruzzo, Italy

    Alexandra Legrand, Giovanna Radi•Journal of Field Archaeology•2008

  • Lithic Microwear Analysis of Middle Stone Age Artifacts from White Paintings Rock Shelter, Botswana

    R E Donahue, Michael Murphy et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2002

  • Evidence for Maya Household Subsistence and Domestic Activities

    W J Stemp, Christophe G B Helmke et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2010

  • Blood Residue Analysis at Çayönü Tepesi, Turkey

    Thomas H Loy, Thomas Loy et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•1989

  • Experiments with Spears and Arrows on Animal Targets

    George H Odell, Frank L Cowan et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•1986

  • Use-Wear Analyses on Manos and Hide-Processing Stones

    Jenny L Adams•Journal of Field Archaeology•1988

  • Contemporary Stone Tools in Ethiopia

    James Gallagher, James P Gallagher•Journal of Field Archaeology•1977

  • Microwear Analysis in the Maya Lowlands

    M Aldenderfer, Mark S Aldenderfer et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•1989

  • Mesoamerican Obsidian Blades

    Suzanne M Lewenstein, Suzanne Lewenstein•Journal of Field Archaeology•1981

  • Verifying the Reliability of Lithic Use-Wear Assessments by ‘Blind Tests’

    George Hamley Odell, Frieda Odell-Vereecken•Journal of Field Archaeology•1980

  • Utilización de instrumentos de concha durante el Mesolítico y Neolítico inicial en contextos litorales de la región cantábrica

    Open Access•David Cuenca-Solana, David Cuenca Solana et al.•Trabajos de Prehistoria•2010

  • Processus de formation et caractérisation physico-chimique des polis d'utilisation des outils en silex. Application à la technologie préhistorique de l'ivoire

    Marianne Christensen•Bulletin de la Société…•1998

Unique citing works60
Citations per year6,67
Citation span2017 - 2027 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 55

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae