Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What Do Farmers Want From Agri‐Environmental Scheme Design? A Choice Experiment Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID23364309
AuthorsMaria Espinosa (0000-0002-0766-2539, Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training), Maria Espinosa‐Goded, Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé (0000-0002-6422-6047, Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training), Jesús Barreiro‐Hurlé, Eric Ruto (0000-0001-7318-0688, Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume61
Issue2
Pages259-273
Publication date2010-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Agricultural Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-857X • E-ISSN: 1477-9552
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00244.x
OpenAlexW2097511787
LanguageEN
Citations received100
References cited22

Agri‐environmental schemes (AES) have had a limited effect on European agriculture due to farmers’ reluctance to participate. Information on how farmers react when AES characteristics are modified can be an important input to the design of such policies. This article investigates farmers’ preferences for different design options in a specific AES aimed at encouraging nitrogen fixing crops in marginal dry‐land areas in Spain. We use a choice experiment survey conducted in two regions (Aragón and Andalusia). The analysis employs an error component random parameter logit model allowing for preference heterogeneity and correlation amongst the non‐status quo alternatives. Farmers show a strong preference for maintaining their current management strategies; however, significant savings in cost or increased participation can be obtained by modifying some AES attributes.

Agricultural economics · Agricultural science · Agriculture · Business · Econometrics · Economics · Environmental economics · Geography · Logistic regression · Microeconomics · Mixed logit · Order (exchange) · Preference · Public economics · Revealed preference · Statistics · Status quo · Status quo bias · Survey data collection · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets · Environmental Science · Mathematics

  • Food for thought-examining farmers' willingness to engage in conservation stewardship around a protected area in central India

    Open Access•Mahi Puri, Elizabeth Frances Pienaar et al.•Conservation Ecology•2021

  • Can Agricultural Cooperatives Promote Chinese Farmers’ Adoption of Green Technologies

    Open Access•Dong Chong, Hainan Wang et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Understanding farmers' reluctance to reduce pesticide use

    Open Access•Benoît Chèze, Maïa David et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Using Choice Experiments to Investigate the Policy Relevance of Heterogeneity in Farmer Agri-Environmental Contract Preferences

    Open Access•Stine Wamberg Broch, Suzanne Elizabeth Vedel•Environmental and Resource…•2012

  • Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices

    Open Access•Francois J Dessart, Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé et al.•European Review of Agricultural…•2019

  • Effects of Risk Perception of Pests and Diseases on Tea Famers’ Green Control Techniques Adoption

    Open Access•Hai Hu, Andi Cao et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Willingness of Tea Farmers to Adopt Ecological Agriculture Techniques Based on the UTAUT Extended Model

    Open Access•Kexiao Xie, Yuerui Zhu et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Understanding public administrators’ and citizens’ preferences for a successful transition to pesticide-free urban green spaces

    Marianne Lefebvre, Maria Espinosa et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2024

  • The role of rice farmers’ attitude and trust in government in decision-making for participating in a climate-related agri-environmental scheme

    Sheng-Han-Erin Chang, Emmanuel Olatunbosun Benjamin et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2024

  • Adverse selection and severe design constraints in PES

    Open Access•Pedro Gasparinetti, Sven Wunder et al.•Ecological Economics•2026

  • Economic results and production choices of Italian arable farms under the CAP 2023–2027 first pillar reform

    Open Access•Rebecca Buttinelli, Simone Severini et al.•Land Use Policy•2026

  • Simultaneous production decisions in agricultural contexts

    Open Access•Julia Höhler, Jörg Müller•British Food Journal•2021

  • What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes

    Open Access•Xavier B Lastra-Bravo, Carmen Hubbard et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • Alternative adaptation scenarios towards pesticide-free urban green spaces

    Open Access•Marianne Lefebvre, Masha Maslianskaïa-Pautrel et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • Common preferences of European small-scale forest owners towards contract-based management

    Open Access•Artti Juutinen, Elena Haeler et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2022

  • Forest owners' interest in participation and their compensation claims in voluntary landscape value trading

    Open Access•Erkki Mäntymaa, Eija Pouta et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2021

  • Contracts for afforestation and the role of monitoring for landowners’ willingness to accept

    Open Access•Suzanne Elizabeth Vedel, Jette B Jacobsen et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2014

  • Farmers' preferences for water-saving strategies in Brazilian eucalypt plantations

    Open Access•Gabriela Demarchi, Julie Subervie et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2021

  • An alternative approach to create and deploy discrete choice experiments

    Timothy R Silberg, Robert B Richardson et al.•International Journal of Social…•2023

  • Analysis of Consumer Preference for Vitamin A-Fortified Sugar in Kenya

    Open Access•Kennedy Otieno Pambo, David Jakinda Otieno et al.•European Journal of Development…•2016

  • A behavioural agent-based modelling approach for the ex-ante assessment of policies supporting precision agriculture

    Open Access•Ruth Huber, Karin Späti et al.•Ecological Economics•2023

  • Designing agri-environmental schemes to cope with uncertainty

    Open Access•Margaux Lapierre, Gwenolé Le Velly et al.•Ecological Economics•2022

  • The role of behavioural factors in accepting agri-environmental contracts – Evidence from a Q-method and thematic analysis in Germany

    Open Access•Carina Ober, Carolin Canessa et al.•Ecological Economics•2025

  • Hungry Birds and Angry Farmers

    Open Access•Michael T Bennett, Yazhen Gong et al.•Ecological Economics•2018

  • Ex-ante assessment of the cost-effectiveness of public policies to sequester carbon in soils

    Open Access•Jean‐Marc Blazy, J-M Blazy et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Potential and economic efficiency of using reduced tillage to mitigate climate effects in Danish agriculture

    Open Access•Marianne Zandersen, Sisse Liv Jørgensen et al.•Ecological Economics•2016

  • Investigating fishers’ preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes

    Open Access•Rhona Barr, Rhona F Barr et al.•Ecological Economics•2014

  • Determinants of farmers’ willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones—A choice experiment study

    Open Access•Tove Christensen, Anders Branth Pedersen et al.•Ecological Economics•2011

  • Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-environmental schemes

    Open Access•Douadia Bougherara, Margaux Lapierre et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Understanding diversity in farmers’ routinized crop protection practices

    Open Access•Antonia Kaiser, Paul Burger•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • How sources of agriculture information shape the adoption of reduced tillage practices

    Open Access•Miroslava Bavorova, Ilkay Unay‐gailhard et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2020

  • Consumer willingness to pay for food safety interventions

    Open Access•Kofi Britwum, Amalia Yiannaka•Food Policy•2019

  • Credit-Based Payments for Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•Matthew Cranford, Susana Mourato•World Development•2014

  • Does exclusion matter in conservation agreements? A case of mangrove users in the Ecuadorian coast using participatory choice experiments

    Open Access•Jorge Higinio Maldonado, Rocío Del Pilar Moreno-Sánchez et al.•World Development•2019

  • Factors affecting farmer participation in agri-environment schemes in the uplands of Northern Ireland

    Open Access•Barry Quinn, Stuart Henderson et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2025

  • Understanding PES from the ground up

    Open Access•Karen E Allen, Gregory Colson•Sustainability Science•2019

  • Identifying the Factors That Influence Farmer Participation in Environmental Management Practices in Switzerland

    Open Access•Eleni Karali, Beat Brunner et al.•Human Ecology•2014

  • Evaluating policy impact under sparse and staggered adoption. A synthetic difference-in-differences application to EU rural development measures

    Open Access•Roberto Esposti•Evaluation and Program Planning•2026

  • Incentivizing a regime change in Dutch agriculture

    Open Access•Mark Koetse, J Bouma•Environmental Innovation and…•2022

  • Use of discrete choice experiments to facilitate design of effective environmentally friendly agricultural policies

    Open Access•Na-na Wang, Liangguo Luo et al.•Environment Development and…•2019

  • Can pro-environmental behavior increase farmers’ income?—Evidence from arable land quality protection practices in China

    Open Access•Jin Liu, Qing Xu et al.•Economic Research-Ekonomska…•2023

  • Designing a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania

    Open Access•David Kaczan, Brent M Swallow et al.•Ecological Economics•2013

  • Contract Design for Adoption of Agrienvironmental Practices

    Open Access•Fateh Mamine, M'hand Fares et al.•Ecological Economics•2020

  • Compensating Environmental Losses Versus Creating Environmental Gains

    Open Access•Philippe Le Coent, Raphaële Préget et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality

    Open Access•Suzanne Elizabeth Vedel, Jette B Jacobsen et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • Do outcome or input risks limit adoption of environmental projects

    Open Access•Megan Star, J Rolfe et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Rancher Preferences for a Payment for Ecosystem Services Program in Southwestern Wyoming

    Open Access•Kristiana Hansen, Esther Duke et al.•Ecological Economics•2018

  • Payments for ecosystem services or collective stewardship of Mother Earth? Applying deliberative valuation in an indigenous community in Colombia

    Open Access•Bosco Lliso, Unai Pascual et al.•Ecological Economics•2020

  • Factors affecting farmers' willingness to participate in eutrophication mitigation — A case study of preferences for wetland creation in Sweden

    Open Access•Frida Franzén, Patrik Dinnétz et al.•Ecological Economics•2016

  • Nature Based Solutions for Climate Adaptation - Paying Farmers for Flood Control

    Open Access•Marianne Zandersen, Jakob Stoktoft Oddershede et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • The Role of Farmers' Understanding of Nature in Shaping their Uptake of Nature Protection Measures

    Open Access•Nataliya Stupak, Jürn Sanders et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Heterogeneity of preferences for the benefits of Environmental Stewardship

    Open Access•Guy Garrod, Eric Ruto et al.•Ecological Economics•2012

  • Farmers’ behavioural determinants of on-farm biodiversity management in Europe

    Open Access•Fabian Klebl, Peter H Feindt et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2024

  • Incorporating agri-environment schemes into farm development pathways

    Open Access•Julie Ingram, Peter Gaskell et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Assessment of real and perceived cost-effectiveness to inform agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation policies

    Open Access•F Alcon, María Dolores de-Miguel et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Assessing landowners’ preferences to inform voluntary private land conservation

    Open Access•Gonzalo Cortés-Capano, Gonzalo Cortés‐Capano et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Predicted enrollment in alternative attribute Conservation Reserve Program contracts

    Open Access•Siew Lim, Siew Hoon Lim et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Agricultural landowners’ willingness to participate in a filter strip program for watershed protection

    Open Access•Felix Kwame Yeboah, Frank Lupi et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Policy schemes for the transition to sustainable agriculture—Farmer preferences and spatial heterogeneity in northern Thailand

    Open Access•Yingluck Kanchanaroek, Uzma Aslam•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes

    Open Access•Anna Massfeller, Manuela Meraner et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • How does longer term participation in agri-environment schemes [re]shape farmers’ environmental dispositions and identities

    Open Access•Mark Riley•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Provision of ecosystem services from the management of Natura 2000 sites in Umbria (Italy)

    Open Access•L Rocchi, Carla Cortina et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Effects of awareness on farmers’ compliance with diffuse pollution mitigation measures

    Open Access•Murat Okumah, Julia Martin-Ortega et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Effects of payments for ecosystem services programs in China on rural household labor allocation and land use

    Open Access•Ying Wang, Qi Zhang et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy

    Open Access•Calum Brown, Eszter Krasznai Kovacs et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Agri-environmental policy valuation

    Open Access•Nele Lienhoop, Roland Brouwer et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Farmers’ perceived cost of land use restrictions

    Open Access•Sebastien Lizin, Steven Van Passel et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Defining agri-environmental schemes in the buffer areas of a natural regional park

    Open Access•L Rocchi, Luisa Paolotti et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Which smallholders are willing to adopt Acacia mangium under long-term contracts? Evidence from a choice experiment study in Indonesia

    Open Access•Dwiko Budi Permadi, Michael Burton et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Varieties of agri-environmental schemes in China

    Open Access•Lanlan Zhu, Zhu Lanlan et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity and environmental protection

    Open Access•Emmanouil Tyllianakis, Julia Martin-Ortega•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Integrating Aspects of Ecosystem Dimensions into Sorghum and Wheat Production Areas in Kinmen, Taiwan

    Open Access•Yi-Hsing Lin, Chun-Fu Hong et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Farmers’ heterogeneous preferences towards results-based environmental policies

    Open Access•Olli Niskanen, Annika Tienhaara et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • A window into land managers’ preferences for new forms of agri-environmental schemes

    Open Access•Emmanouil Tyllianakis, Julia Martin-Ortega et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Assessing the benefit of the agroecosystem services

    Open Access•Anastasija Novikova, L Rocchi et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Does the CAP reflect the population's concerns about agricultural landscapes? A qualitative study in Lower Saxony, Germany

    Open Access•Schüler, Stefan Schüler et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Farmers’ preferences for nature conservation compensation measures with a focus on eco-accounts according to the German Nature Conservation Act

    Open Access•Christian Sponagel, Elisabeth Angenendt et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Do differential payments for agri-environment schemes affect the environmental benefits? A case study in the North-Eastern Italy

    Open Access•Fabio Bartolini, Daniele Vergamini et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • The design of agri-environmental schemes

    Open Access•Anastasio J Villanueva, José A Gómez-Limón et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • It is not only about money —– German farmers' preferences regarding voluntary standards for farm sustainability management

    Open Access•Veronika Hannus, Johannes Sauer•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Carbon blinkers and policy blindness

    Open Access•Sophie Wynne‐jone, S Wynne-Jones•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Farm size and participation in agri-environmental measures

    Open Access•İlkay Unay Gailhard, Štefan Bojnec•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Investigating rice farmers’ preferences for an agri-environmental scheme

    Open Access•Sheng-Han-Erin Chang, David Wuepper et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Drivers of farmers’ willingness to adopt extensive farming practices in a globally important bird area

    Open Access•Mikolaj Czajkowski, Katarzyna Zagórska et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Farmers’ adoption of extensive wheat production – Determinants and implications

    Open Access•R Finger, Nadja El Benni•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Territorial management contracts as a tool to enhance the sustainability of sloping and mountainous olive orchards

    Open Access•Beatriz Rocamora-Montiel, Klaus Glenk et al.•Land Use Policy•2014

  • Identifying additional barriers in the adoption of agri-environmental schemes

    Open Access•Maria Espinosa, M Espinosa-Goded et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • A European perspective on acceptability of innovative agri-environment-climate contract solutions

    Open Access•Riccardo D’alberto, Stefano Targetti et al.•Land Use Policy•2024

  • Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden – historical lessons and emerging issues

    Open Access•Morten Graversgaard, Brian H Jacobsen et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented agri-environmental schemes

    Open Access•Annukka Vainio, Annika Tienhaara et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Bringing the neighbors in

    Open Access•Sergio Villamayor-Toma, Sergio Villamayor-Tomas et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Examining the relationship between farmer participation in an agri-environment scheme and the quantity and quality of semi-natural habitats on Irish farms

    Open Access•Andreas Tsakiridis, Cathal O’donoghue et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Provision of public goods by agriculture and forestry

    Open Access•Davide Viaggi, Meri Raggi et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Patterns of agri-environmental scheme participation in Europe

    Open Access•Evangelos Pavlis, Evangelos S Pavlis et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Exploring the commodification of biodiversity using olive oil producers’ willingness to accept

    Open Access•Melania Salazar-Ordóñez, Melania Salazar‐Ordóñez et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Producing rice while conserving the habitat of an endangered waterbird

    Open Access•Matthew W Herring, Stephen T Garnett et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Farmers’ preferences for nutrient and climate-related agri-environmental schemes

    Open Access•Berit Hasler, Mikolaj Czajkowski et al.•AMBIO•2019

  • Drivers of Management of Spider Plant (Gynandropsis gynandra) Across Different Socio-linguistic Groups in Benin and Togo

    Open Access•Dêêdi E O Sogbohossou, Enoch G Achigan-Dako et al.•Economic Botany•2018

  • Condicionantes Da Disposição De Participar E Aceitar Pagamentos Por Serviços Ambientais

    Open Access•Isaque Regis Ouverney, Ronaldo Seroa Da Motta et al.•Revista de Economia Contemporânea•2018

  • Turning Farmers into Conservationists? Progress and Prospects

    Open Access•Mark Riley•Geography Compass•2011

  • The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models

    Joffre Swait, J D Swait et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•1993

  • Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses

    Open Access•W Michael Hanemann•American Journal of Agricultural…•1984

  • The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models

    Open Access•Joffre Swait, J D Swait et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•1993

  • Status quo bias in decision making

    Open Access•William Samuelson, Richard Zeckhauser•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•1988

  • Environmental constraints on agricultural growth in 19th century granada (Southern Spain)

    Open Access•M G De Molina•Ecological Economics•2002

  • Using choice experiments to assess smallholder farmers' preferences for pig breeding traits in different production systems in North–West Vietnam

    Open Access•Regina Roessler, Adam G Drucker et al.•Ecological Economics•2008

  • Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya

    Open Access•Riccardo Scarpa, Eric Ruto et al.•Ecological Economics•2003

  • Factors Affecting European Farmers' Participation in Biodiversity Policies

    Open Access•Rosemarie Siebert, Mark Toogood et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2006

  • A New Approach to Consumer Theory

    Kelvin Lancaster, Kelvin J Lancaster•Journal of Political Economy•1966

  • Anomalies

    Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch et al.•The Journal of Economic…•1991

  • Ageing and Succession on Family Farms

    Open Access•Clive Potter, Matt Lobley•Sociologia Ruralis•1992

  • Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option

    Ravi Dhar•Journal of Consumer Research•1997

Unique citing works100
Citations per year6,67
Citation span2011 - 2026 (16)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 97

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae