Civil-Military Relations in the United States and Russia

An Alternative Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID2340685
AuthorsDale Herspring (Kansas State University), Dale R Herspring (Kansas State University, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume35
Issue4
Pages667-687
Publication date2009-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArmed Forces & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0095-327X • E-ISSN: 1556-0848
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0095327x09332140
OpenAlexW2019126467
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited15

The key to understanding civil-military relations in polities such as Russia and the United States is military culture. Military culture includes a variety of characteristics or norms of behavior. Some such as executive leadership, respect for military expertise, and a clear chain of command are critical and exist in both the American and Russian militaries. Looking at two periods in both countries (Yeltsin and George Bush II, and Putin and George Bush I), this article maintains that in those instances when military culture was ignored in either country (e.g., a lack of executive leadership, little respect for military expertise, and lack of a clear chain of command), conflict not only existed but also was acerbated. Conversely, in cases where the civilians were firmly in charge but respected military culture, conflict was minimized. Senior military officers felt free to express their opinions and had the perception that their views were always taken seriously

Civil–military relations · George (robot) · Military operations other than war · Military personnel · Military psychology · Military science · Military sociology · Military theory · Military threat · Political science · Politics · Revolution in Military Affairs · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Variety (cybernetics) · History · Law · Military and Defense Studies · Military History and Strategy · Nuclear Issues and Defense

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub