The Placement of Insanity

Assessments of Grave Disability and Involuntary Commitment Decisions

Bibliographic Data

ID2344121
AuthorsJames A Holstein (0000-0002-0072-3095, corresponding author)
Year1984
Volume13
Issue1
Pages35-62
Publication date1984-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Life (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0098-3039
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0098303984013001003
OpenAlexW2172197937
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited10

This ethnography of legal proceedings examines how judgments of "grave disability" are formulated to effect involuntary mental hospitalizations. Such commitment decisions are based on judges' pragmatic evaluations of the viability of candidate patients' proposed community living situations and the ability of those situations to contain the havoc associated with mental illness. In assessing the tenability of candidate patients' proposed living arrangements, judges consider the following: (1) the person's ability to provide life's basic necessities; (2) the willing presence of a "caretaker" to supervise the candidate patient; and (3) the candidate patient's cooperation with a community-based treatment/custody regime. In the absence of any of these, social and psychiatric disturbances are considered inevitable, and hospitalization is likely to be ordered

Ethnography · Insanity · Mental health · Mental illness · Psychiatry · Sociology · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Medicine · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub