Die Praxis der Verständigung im Strafprozess
Eine Evaluation der Vorschriften des Gesetzes zur Regelung der Verständigung im Strafverfahren vom 29. Juli 2009
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23524490 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Karsten Altenhain, Matthias Jahn (0000-0002-0971-1672), Jörg Kinzig |
| Year | 2020 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Die Praxis der Verständigung im Strafprozess (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5771/9783748922094 |
| OpenAlex | W3095233154 |
| ISBN | 9783748922094 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 1 |
The so-called “Verständigung im Strafverfahren“ – plea bargaining in criminal cases – is and has been a highly controversial issue. In 2013, the German Federal Constitutional Court ruled the respective provisions of the German criminal code constitutional. Still, it assigned legislators the task to constantly examine the effectiveness of the inherent protective measures to ensure its constitutionality. This volume presents the findings from a nationwide research project undertaken by researchers from the Universities of Düsseldorf, Frankfurt am Main and Tübingen. Based on the analysis of relevant court rulings, court records and both surveys and interviews with pertinent court personnel, it analyzes how the law is applied in practice.
Constitution · Constitutional court · Constitutionality · German · Plea · Political science · Praxis · Supreme court · Criminal Law and Evidence · Criminal Law and Policy · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2023 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |