Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Theoretical Generalization and Historical Particularity in the Comparative Sociology of Reinhard Bendix

Bibliographic Data

ID23596201
AuthorsDietrich Rueschemeyer (corresponding author)
Year1984
Pages129-169
Publication date1984-09-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueVision and Method in Historical Sociology (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/cbo9780511621567.006
OpenAlexW597908643
ISBN9780511621567
LanguageEN
Citations received7

The work of Reinhard Bendix embodies a distinctive sense of the fundamental purpose of sociological work. In 1951, virtually at the outset of his scholarly career, in the programmatic essay “Social Science and the Distrust of Reason,” he distanced himself from a conception of social science that acknowledges no other rationale for its pursuits than the validity of specific findings and their possible usefulness for varied social purposes. This common view, Bendix argued, makes a fetish of science and relinquishes belief in a reason transcending empiricism, which since the Enlightenment had shaped ideas of the good society and determined the significance of questions and findings in social investigation. Bendix understood the intellectual developments – from Bacon to Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud – that led to the destruction of this faith in reason, yet he was concerned that “we pay for the greater empiricism of modern social science with unconscious and uncritical subordination of intellectual endeavor to the social and political forces of our time.” The critical position he advocates is not primarily defined in substantive terms. With Max Weber, Bendix views intellectual clarification, human enlightenment, as the central task of the social sciences. In a formulation reminiscent of German idealism of the late nineteenth century, he urges that we “take our stand on the ground that our intellectual life is enriched by worthwhile research in the social sciences. Such research is a token of high civilization, worth preserving as an integral part of our quest for knowledge.”

Empiricism · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Psychoanalysis · Social science · Sociology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The History of Historical-Comparative Methods in Sociology

    Chares Demetriou, Roudometof et al.•Oxford Handbook of Qualitative…•2020

  • B endix, R einhard

    Open Access•Héctor Vera•Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2017

  • Can One or a Few Cases Yield Theoretical Gains?

    Open Access•Dietrich Rueschemeyer•Comparative Historical Analysis…•2003

  • South Korea during the Park Chung Hee Era

    Kurtuluş Gemici•Asian journal of social science•2013

  • Between Scylla and Charybdis

    Open Access•Raymond Caldwell•History of the Human Sciences•2002

  • Comparação, história e interpretação

    Open Access•Renato Perissinotto•Revista Brasileira de Ciências…•2013

  • Bringing What State Back In? Neo-Marxism and the Origin of the Committee on States and Social Structures

    Open Access•Rafael Khachaturian•Political Research Quarterly•2019

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,29
Citation span2002 - 2020 (19)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae