Regulation of Religious Markets
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23614743 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles M North (Baylor University, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Paul Oslington (0000-0001-6819-3601) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Pages | 530-511 |
| Publication date | 2014-02-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | The Oxford Handbook Of Christianity And Economics (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199729715.013.026 |
| OpenAlex | W2495990376 |
| ISBN | 9780199729715 |
| Language | EN |
This chapter summarizes the current state of economic research on the regulation of religious markets and suggests directions for the future. Following a discussion of the differing views of Adam Smith and David Hume on the wisdom of state support of religion, the chapter next describes the early work—mainly by sociologists—on the empirical relationship between religious pluralism and religious participation. Because of substantial flaws in the pluralism/participation research, emphasis in more recent years has shifted to studying the effects of regulations on religion, such as the existence of state religions and restrictions on freedoms of religious groups. In the future, more work needs to be done to answer empirical questions on the effects of religious regulation, but more importantly economists need to develop a holistic theory of religious market regulation that accounts for the simultaneous decisions of individuals, religious organizations, and government actors.
Economic freedom · Economics · Empirical research · Epistemology · Government (linguistics) · Law and economics · Pluralism (philosophy) · Political science · Positive economics · Religious freedom · Religious organization · Religious pluralism · Sociology · State (computer science) · Work (physics) · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |