Reason and Reflective Judgment
Kant on the Significance of Systematicity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23635940 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Guyer (0000-0001-7195-6710, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Pages | 11-37 |
| Publication date | 2005-04-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Kant's System of Nature and Freedom (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273461.003.0002 |
| OpenAlex | W4230538856 |
| ISBN | 9780199273461 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
This chapter argues that Kant's reassignment of the regulative principles of scientific inquiry from the faculty of reason (in the Critique of Pure Reason) to the faculty of reflective judgment (in the Critique of the Power of Judgment) reflects his recognition that systematicity is a necessary condition for scientific knowledge, not a desideratum additional to scientific knowledge, even though it remains, as in the first Critique, a regulative ideal.
Epistemology · Ideal (ethics) · Physics · Power (physics) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2022 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |