Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Respect, Dignity, and the Kingdom of Ends

Bibliographic Data

ID23648252
AuthorsDavid Cummiskey (0009-0009-3337-6438, corresponding author)
Year1996
Pages124-139
Publication date1996-04-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueKantian consequentialism (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University PressNew York (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/0195094530.003.0007
OpenAlexW2484208710
ISBN9780195094534
LanguageEN
References cited61

There are many versions of Kantian ethics and even more supposedly Kantian objections to Consequentialism. By considering three of the more sweeping and influential objections, we shall see that there are general conceptual difficulties with Kantian responses to consequentialism, and Kantian consequentialism in particular. We consider, first, the significance of the Kantian deontologist emphasis on the principle of respect for persons. Second, we explore the relevance of Kant's distinction between price and dignity, his conception of the dignity of humanity, and Hill's interpretation of the dignity principle. Third, and last, we focus on Kant's related formula of the kingdom of ends, and consider Rawls’ development of Kant's idea in his hypothetical social contract theory and more general Kantian constructivist conception of moral reasoning.

Categorical imperative · Consequentialism · Dignity · Epistemology · Humanity · Interpretation (philosophy) · Kantian ethics · Morality · Political science · Relevance (law) · Theology · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Anarchy, State, and Utopia•1975

  • Kant's Theory of Freedom

    Open Access•Henry E Allison•Kant's Theory of Freedom•1990

  • Moral Thinking

    R M Hare•Moral thinking•1981

  • Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics

    Open Access•David O Brink•Moral Realism and the Foundations…•1989

  • The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories

    Michael Stocker, Inc The Journal Of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•1976

  • Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection

    Frank Jackson•Ethics•1991

  • Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person

    Harry G Frankfurt•The Journal of Philosophy•1971

  • Darwall on Practical Reason Impartial Reason . Stephen L. Darwall

    Thomas E Hill, Thomas E Hill Thomas E Hill•Ethics•1986

  • Revisability and Rational Choice

    Open Access•Allen Buchanan•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•1975

  • Autonomy and Self-Respect

    Open Access•Thomas E Hill, Thomas E Jr Hill et al.•Autonomy and Self-Respect•1991

  • Preference and Urgency

    T M Scanlon, Т М Scanlon•The Journal of Philosophy•1975

  • Utilitarianism and Human Rights

    Open Access•Allan Gibbard•Social Philosophy and Policy•1984

  • Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality (1984)

    Open Access•Peter Railton•Facts, Values, and Norms•2003

  • Utilitarianism, For and Against

    Leo Rauch•Philosophical Studies•1974

  • Skepticism about Practical Reason

    Christine M Korsgaard•The Journal of Philosophy•1986

  • Moral Saints

    Susan Wolf, Susan M Wolf•The Journal of Philosophy•1982

  • Desert and Entitlement

    David Cummiskey•Analysis•1987

  • Kantian Consequentialism

    David Cummiskey•Ethics•1990

  • Rights and Autonomy

    David AJ Richards•Ethics•1981

  • Two Kinds of Respect

    Stephen Darwall, Stephen L Darwall•Ethics•1977

  • The Liberal Theory of Justice

    Edward F Mcclennen•Social Theory and Practice•1974

  • Kant's anti‐moralistic strain

    Open Access•Thomas E Hill•Theoria•1978

  • Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism

    Michael Slote, Michael A Slote•Common-Sense Morality and…•2020

  • Modern Moral Philosophy

    Open Access•G E M Anscombe•Philosophy•1958

  • What a good man can bring himself to do

    Open Access•R G Frey•The Journal of Value Inquiry•1978

  • Fairness to Goodness

    John Rawls•The Philosophical Review•1975

  • Moral Relativism Defended

    Gilbert Harman•The Philosophical Review•1975

  • Two Concepts of Rules

    John Rawls•The Philosophical Review•1955

  • Some Common Misinterpretations of the Kantian Ethics

    H H Schroeder•The Philosophical Review•1940

  • Two Distinctions in Goodness

    Christine M Korsgaard•The Philosophical Review•1983

  • Goods and Virtues

    Sarah Conly, Michael Slote•The Philosophical Review•1986

  • Moral Realism

    Peter Railton•The Philosophical Review•1986

  • The Emptiness of the Moral Will

    Allen W Wood, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•1989

  • Kant’s Theory of Moral Sensibility. Respect for the Moral Law and the Influence of Inclination

    Andrews Reath•Kant-Studien•1989

  • Kant’s Analysis of Obligation

    Christine M Korsgaard, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•1989

  • Consequentialism and History

    Open Access•Paul Gomberg•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•1989

  • Hedonism, Heteronomy and Kant's Principle of Happiness

    Open Access•Andrews Reath•Pacific philosophical quarterly•1989

  • The Alleged Moral Repugnance of Acting from Duty

    Marcia Baron•The Journal of Philosophy•1984

  • Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory

    John Rawls•The Journal of Philosophy•1980

  • Kantian Ethics and Supererogation

    Marcia Baron•The Journal of Philosophy•1987

  • Utilitarianism and Integrity

    Sarah Conly, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•1983

  • Taking Rights Seriously

    Ronald Dworkin•Taking Rights Seriously•2013

  • Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory

    Open Access•John C Harsanyi•American Political Science Review•1975

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae