Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Text and figure in ancient Mesopotamia

Match and mismatch

Bibliographic Data

ID23675147
AuthorsJ N Postgate (corresponding author)
Year1994
Pages176-184
Publication date1994-05-26
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueAncient Mind (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/cbo9780511598388.018
OpenAlexW258608398
ISBN9780511598388
LanguageEN
Citations received6

It is not necessary to stress that for the archaeologist in search of a society's thought processes, documents from the practice of religion or politics are of prime importance. With the durability of its written output on clay tablets, Mesopotamia offers an excellent opportunity to exploit this avenue, but it has not been followed in recent years. There has been a general reluctance on the part of archaeologists to engage with the written evidence, and those who read the texts have been equally reluctant to cross this barrier. With rare exceptions, when one side decides to make a foray into strange territory, it is just that - a foray, almost a commando raid, which takes some booty, wrenches it from its background and then proceeds to exploit it in their home territory according to their own priorities. This is bound to lead to mistakes: each side must take cognizance of the totality of the other side's data base, and understand how the tempting prizes actually belong in their own context. A totem pole, or a crucifix taken from an altar and nailed to a museum wall, cannot be understood without a knowledge of its provenance. Yet this is the way juicy snippets of information from the other side of the historical/archaeological divide have tended to be treated. This is therefore, in part, a plea for increased crossfrontier awareness, accompanied by the proviso that one must match the ensemble of each body of data, not just selected items. Every tool at our disposal must be brought in.

Altar · Ancient history · Antique · Archaeology · Art · Computer security · Context (archaeology) · Exploit · Mesopotamia · Political science · Politics · Ancient Egypt and Archaeology · Ancient Near East History · Computer Science · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Law

  • The Symbolic Role of Animals in Babylon

    Open Access•Chikako E Watanabe•Iraq•2015

  • Monstrøsitet som kulturel og religiøs diskurs

    Open Access•Laura Feldt•Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift•2003

  • Hoards, votives, offerings

    Robin Osborne•World Archaeology•2004

  • The Construction of Women’s Identities through Commemorative Objects in Bronze Age Mesopotamia

    Nancy Highcock, Christina Tsouparopoulou•Altorientalische Forschungen•2020

  • Acts of Neolithic ritualization associated with Levantine bovine figurines

    Estelle Orrelle, L K Horwitz•Time and Mind•2018

  • The pre-iconography, iconography and iconology of a sixth to fifth millennium BC Near Eastern incised bone

    Estelle Orrelle, L K Horwitz•Time and Mind•2016

Citations per year0.26
Citation span2003 - 2020 (18)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubLibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae