Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Anonymity, Violation, and Memory Loss

Bibliographic Data

ID23676566
AuthorsMaureen Carroll (0009-0000-2906-9253, corresponding author)
Year2006
Pages59-85
Publication date2006-10-12
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueSPIRITS OF THE DEAD: ROMAN FUNERARY COMMEMORATION IN WESTERN EUROPE. (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780199291076.003.0003
OpenAlexW4388392449
ISBN9780199291076
LanguageEN

The inscribed texts on funerary monuments play an important role in naming the deceased and his or her position in society. As Connerton highlights, the fact that something is inscribed demonstrates a will to be remembered. If there is one thing that the majority of epitaphs have in common it is the naming of the deceased. How important was the survival of one’s name? For Pliny the Younger, at least, nothing affected him so strongly ‘as the desire of a lasting name’.2 This sentiment is echoed in the epitaph of Marcus Antonius Antius Lupus, a military tribune put to death by the emperor Commodus. The inscription expressed the conviction that despite his treatment by Commodus his name would be a cause for perpetual celebration.

Ancient history · Anonymity · Art · Conviction · Emperor · Epistemology · Epitaph · Genealogy · Inscribed figure · Literature · Nothing · Political science · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical and Religious Studies of Rome · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Law · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae