Conclusion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23684256 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anandi Hattiangadi (0000-0002-3061-6143, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Pages | 209-212 |
| Publication date | 2007-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Oughts and Thoughts (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219025.003.0008 |
| OpenAlex | W4244410007 |
| ISBN | 9780199219025 |
| Language | EN |
This concluding chapter synthesizes the arguments presented in the preceding chapters. It is argued that although we may not yet have an adequate theory of representation, we have no reason to believe that none will be forthcoming. The incoherence of the sceptical conclusion gives us some reason to believe that a fully adequate theory of intentionality will be forthcoming.
Cognitive science · Epistemology · Intentionality · Political science · Representation (politics) · Skepticism · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |