The Macarthur Controversy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23709396 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steven Casey (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Pages | 233-264 |
| Publication date | 2008-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Selling the Korean War (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressNew York (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306927.003.0010 |
| OpenAlex | W2477019297 |
| ISBN | 9780195306927 |
| Language | EN |
Truman's decision to fire MacArthur in April 1951 initially threatened to make the domestic situation even worse. Indeed, Republicans hoped to exploit the opportunity to challenge the administration's whole Asian policy, and perhaps even impeach one or two senior officials. Within weeks, however, the MacArthur controversy worked to the administration's benefit. For the first time in months, senior officials engaged in a sustained and coordinated effort to make the case for war. MacArthur was thus outgunned. He was also placed on the defensive, having to rebut the official claim that his vision would result in a disastrous world war. More broadly, crucial figures in Congress, both southern Democrats and internationalist Republicans, rallied behind Truman's position, ending the disastrous prospect that had loomed so large in the winter—the prospect that the broad bipartisan Cold War coalition would soon collapse.
Administration (probate law) · Cold war · Economics · Political science · Politics · Position (finance) · History · Law · Military History and Strategy · Public Administration · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |