Animal Work
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23735159 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jocelyne Porcher (0000-0002-2280-7628, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Linda Kalof |
| Year | 2017 |
| Pages | 301-318 |
| Publication date | 2017-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927142.013.8 |
| OpenAlex | W4236386944 |
| ISBN | 9780199927142 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Although the presence of animals in our lives seems natural, it is not; it depends on work. But we don’t know what work means for a dog, a horse, or a cow. This chapter proposes a concept of animal work, and argues that there is a subjective involvement of animals in work and intersubjective relations between humans and animals at work. This working is based on a range of structural elements that reflect human work and demonstrate that animals are implicated in work. However, animals also show at work their own way of seeing work according to what the context of production allows, their resistance and their propositions. Faced with an anthropological rupture with animals and the end of domestication, driven by alimentation biotech firms and abolitionists, it is now more important than ever to understand the building blocks of the human-animal bond, such as animal work.
Biology · Context (archaeology) · Domestication · Sociology · Work (physics) · Ecology · Engineering · Geographies of human-animal interactions
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |