Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluation of the personal health budget pilot programme

Bibliographic Data

ID23757293
AuthorsJulien Forder (0000-0001-7793-4328), Karen Jones (0000-0002-4787-6830)
Year2022
Pages125-132
Publication date2022-03-04
Open AccessYes
TypeOTHER
VenueDebates in Personalisation (JOURNAL)
PublisherBristol University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.46692/9781447313434.014
OpenAlexW4214872719
ISBN9781447313434
LanguageEN
Citations received5

In England, the personal health budget initiative is an important part of the current personalisation agenda for health care services. Its aim is to place patients at the heart of decisions about services they receive. The personal health budget initiative was first proposed in the 2008 NHS Next Stage Review as a process of giving patients greater control over services they receive and how their support is managed. A number of design principles underlie personal health budgets, including: 1. Patients should know the resource level available within the budget; 2. Patients should be encouraged to develop a support/care plan that details how the resource will be used to meet their identified needs; 3. Patients should decide how they would like the budget to be managed. In 2009, the Department of Health invited PCTs to become pilot sites for the personal health budget pilot programme. An evaluation was commissioned to run alongside in order to provide an account of the personal health budget process from the system and from the view of budget holders and carers. Initially, 64 pilot sites were involved in piloting personal health budgets and contributing to the evaluation. During the evaluation period, the pilot programme remained open and now there are 75 pilot sites implementing personal health budgets. Twenty sites from across the pilots were selected to be in-¬‐depth evaluation sites, with the remainder being wider cohort sites. The overarching aim of the evaluation was to identify whether personal health budgets ensured better health and care-¬‐related outcomes when compared to conventional service delivery and, if so, the best way they should be implemented.

Business · Healthcare innovation and challenges

  • The Spaces of Personalisation

    Open Access•Claudia Needham•Social Policy and Society•2014

  • Implementing personal health budgets in England

    Open Access•ELIZABETH WELCH, Karen Jones et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2016

  • Skill mix

    Open Access•Caroline Norrie, John Woolham et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2019

  • A study of dyadic interdependence of control, social participation and occupation of adults who use long-term care services and their carers

    Open Access•Stacey Rand, Julien Forder et al.•Quality of Life Research•2017

  • Integration of resources in social and healthcare services for ensuring the continuity of care to frail individuals aged 65 or over

    Open Access•Martina Giusti, Santa De Remigis et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

Citations per year0.42
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOILibgenOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae