Constructing a Cosmopolitan Public Sphere

Hermeneutic Capabilities and Universal Values

Bibliographic Data

ID2397690
AuthorsHans-Herbert Kögler (0000-0003-0321-4090, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA,), Hans‐herbert Kögler (University of North Florida, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume8
Issue3
Pages297-320
Publication date2005-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Social Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1368-4310 • E-ISSN: 1461-7137
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1368431005054796
OpenAlexW2095330596
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited22

Democratic politics might be defined as the agonistic struggle of different parties, groups or individuals over resources, recognition and influence under reciprocal and inclusive conditions. It is based on an unconditional orientation to equality as well as freedom of all those involved to consent to - or dissent from - the norms, policies and practices that are established in the process of public dialogue. This article reconstructs the general agent-based capabilities required for a democratically defined public sphere under conditions of globalization. Making capabilities central is intended to correct a certain over-emphasis regarding institutional macro-structures in the discourse on globalization and cosmopolitanism. After setting the stage with a critical analysis of Martha Nussbaum's concept of capabilities, the analysis proceeds in two major steps. In the first part, a notion of hermeneutic agency is introduced that avoids a Foucauldian reduction of agency to power structures, while thoroughly situating agency in a symbolically mediated social context. The symbolic mediation of agency is, in the second part, taken as a ground of potentiality for reflexive capabilities that, once actualized and enacted, allow for a normatively satisfying process of public deliberation. The aim of the analysis is to relate a normative model of value-orientation to the linguistically grounded empirical resources of social agents. The core argument lays out as basic capabilities (1) to be able to normatively orient oneself at contextually defined yet universally open postconventional commitments, (2) to be able to engage in an interpretive and dialogical perspective-taking vis-a-vis differently situated agents and backgrounds, and (3) to be able to critically distance oneself from one's taken-for-granted assumptions and background structures via a power-alert social reflexivity

Cosmopolitanism · Deliberation · Dialogical self · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public sphere · Social science · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub