Exploring EFL teachers' AI literacy
A phenomenological study within the P-GenAI-C framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24020989 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Masoud Taghipour (0009-0009-1931-0256, Allameh Tabataba'i University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-14 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-05 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1443-9883 • E-ISSN: 1448-0980 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/qrj-02-2026-0078 |
| OpenAlex | W7172490741 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 32 |
Purpose Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching. However, little is known about how experienced teachers make sense of professional AI literacy in the absence of institutional guidance. This study explored how Iranian EFL teachers experienced and interpreted their AI literacy across the five domains of the Professional-GenAI-Competence (P-GenAI-C) framework. Design/methodology/approach An interpretive phenomenological qualitative design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 EFL teachers working in private language institutes in Tehran and Yasuj. The P-GenAI-C domains served as sensitizing concepts in a hybrid, framework-guided analysis that retained openness to emergent meanings across participants' accounts. Interview transcripts were read repeatedly to identify significant statements and meaning units within each participant's account. These meanings were then compared across cases and synthesized into domain-specific and emergent cross-domain themes. Findings Teachers experienced GenAI through pedagogical ambivalence: it offered practical efficiency and creative support while generating uncertainty about accuracy, authenticity, ethics and professional responsibility. AI literacy therefore emerged as situated moral and pedagogical judgment rather than technical proficiency alone, with teachers acting as curriculum negotiators between technological affordances, local cultural expectations and human values. Preparation of Students remained a pronounced gap even among experienced teachers. Originality/value The study extends the P-GenAI-C framework beyond initial teacher education to experienced EFL teachers in an under-researched context. It shows how limited institutional policy and uneven infrastructure intensify teacher agency and support career-spanning professional development, explicit ethical guidance, peer learning communities and locally responsive AI-literacy curricula.
Agency (philosophy) · Curriculum · Literacy · Meaning (existential) · Openness to experience · Perspective (graphical) · Professional development · Qualitative research · Semi-structured interview · Situated · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Online Learning and Analytics · Teaching and Learning Programming
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
Phenomenological research methods
The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities
What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations
Large language models in education
Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education
Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education
Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
Using ChatGPT for second language writing
Conceptualizing AI literacy
A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age
Chatting and cheating
La percepción de la Inteligencia Artificial en contextos educativos tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT
Cognitive ease at a cost
Do digital competence frameworks align with preparing beginning teachers for digitally infused contexts? An evaluation from a New Zealand perspective
Educating digitally competent teachers
Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence
Naturalistic inquiry
What is Wrong with Social Theory
| Highly cited | No |
|---|