Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Building emission reduction feasibility assessment considering uncertainty

Bibliographic Data

ID24033736
AuthorsYang Xu (0000-0003-3898-022X, Harbin Institute of Technology), Xu Yang (0000-0001-5928-7710), Qingbao Gao (Harbin Institute of Technology), Hongyuan Jing (0000-0002-5613-1216, China Academy of Building Research), Wei Wang (0000-0001-5806-2368), Yuan Zheng (0000-0002-4991-0190)
Year2026
Volume12
Pages102082
Publication date2026-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSustainable Futures (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2666-1888
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.sftr.2026.102082
OpenAlexW4413962253
LanguageEN
References cited10

The building sector accounts for 37% of global carbon emissions, which is commonly recognized as a significant contributor to carbon emissions. The emission reduction related to the building sector has received widespread attention. Scientific calculation and assessment of building carbon emissions are fundamental to comprehensively understanding emission characteristics and supporting carbon reduction design with no doubt. However, most of the current mainstream building carbon emission calculation methods neglect the stochastic nature of emission parameters. This study introduced a building emission reduction feasibility assessment considering uncertainty, which defined the carbon compliance probability for buildings, established a probabilistic model for building emission reduction potential, derived probability assessment calculation methods for six distributions, and proposed a probabilistic characterization method for emission reduction feasibility. Validation with a practical case indicates that the proposed model requires minimal computational resources and offers rapid assessment speed; compared with Monte Carlo simulation with a sample size of 106, the proposed method uses only 44.2% of the computational time. Analysis of two real-world engineering cases yields carbon compliance probabilities of 0.8778 and 0.7489, respectively. At a 95% confidence level, the maximum carbon reduction relative to the baseline will not exceed 93.8 tCO2e and 3173 tCO2e for the two cases.

Geometry · Machine learning · Reduction (mathematics) · Sociology · Uncertainty quantification · Uncertainty reduction theory · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Computer Science · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Environmental Science · Mathematics

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae