Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Zur unmittelbaren Wirkung des Unionsrechts

Aufgabe der Kriterien von Van Gend & Loos

Bibliographic Data

ID24036398
AuthorsJuliane Kokott (corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume148
Issue4
Pages496-520
Publication date2023-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchiv des öffentlichen Rechts (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-8911 • E-ISSN: 1868-6796
PublisherMohr Siebeck (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1628/aoer-2023-0029
OpenAlexW4388917229
LanguageDE

It is not so much the Van Gend & Loos judgment, but rather the ECJ's current approach that is novel and comes close to a constitutional revolution. Thus, the effects of EU law before national courts no longer depend on the identification of norms that by their nature can have direct effect. In »technical« areas of law, direct effect may simply be stated. Where important or constitutional principles or values are at stake, the method of mutual amplification is used. I. e. all kinds of norms or principles can be combined to achieve direct effect. This complex approach is a far cry from the concept of a norm that is directly applicable by itself, which is the basis of the Van Gend & Loos judgment. The criterion of precision has become as irrelevant as the fact that a norm grants discretion. Therefore, directives, values, or programmatic norms can have direct effect, especially in combination with each other. The combined effect of direct effect and primacy of EU law gives the ECJ an immense power of direct governance.

Political science · European and International Law Studies · European Union Policy and Governance · Law and Political Science

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae